On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:43:07 -, Matthew Wilcox elven...@gmail.com
wrote:
Obviously this is not right - perhaps I'm not understanding your use
case? Why would you want to specify an author as an attribute on the
element?
Not necessarily as an attribute, I would prefer an element.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:26:31 -, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Actually, they are remarkably similar. I think it's anachronistic to
consider that the utterances of the site owner are in some way distinct
from the utterances of the site readers.
While I do agree with you (for a change),
What's wrong with using a class on the article to identify the author
stylistically? It's already identified semantically by having their name in
the article itself, right (presumably in a footer too)?
On 26 January 2012 13:57, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012
Þann fim 26.jan 2012 14:48, skrifaði Matthew Wilcox:
What's wrong with using a class on the article to identify the author
stylistically? It's already identified semantically by having their name
in the article itself, right (presumably in a footer too)?
As in article class=asdf lolcats
Obviously this is not right - perhaps I'm not understanding your use case?
Why would you want to specify an author as an attribute on the element?
What is wrong with:
article class=by-post-author
pContent/p
footer
p class=authorWritten by: Person/p
/footer
/article
Any time you do this the
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, Shaun Moss wrote:
I've joined this list to put forward the argument that there should be
elements for comment and ad included in the HTML5 spec.
We already have an element for comments and other self-contained document
modules, namely, article. The spec in fact
