Re: [whatwg] Sectioning

2009-11-03 Thread Wesley Walser
I had to read it several times to get it as well. ...regardless of what implied sections other headings may have created. That is the part that answers the questions I believe. Yes, any element that starts an explicit section is *not* a subsection of nearest implicit sections. Also, any element

[whatwg] Sectioning

2009-11-02 Thread Elizabeth Castro
In 4.4.11, it says Sectioning content elements are always considered subsections of their nearest ancestor element of sectioning content, regardless of what implied sections other headings may have created. Does that line mean that a section element is *not* a subsection of the nearest