On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:54:43 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón
wrote:
Thanks for filing the bug report, Simon. I'm thrilled if I can make a
even tiny contribution. It looks like it was already reported on
October 6?
Yeah, I looked into it when you sent an email about this to
h...@whatwg.org.
cheer
Thanks for filing the bug report, Simon. I'm thrilled if I can make a
even tiny contribution. It looks like it was already reported on
October 6?
Best regards,
Ezequiel
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón
> wrote:
>
>> Gr
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 09:56:45 +0200, Ezequiel Garzón
wrote:
Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the
current rules for omission of the p element's end tag:
"A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately
followed by an address, article, aside, b
Greetings! I believe the current standards has an oversight in the
current rules for omission of the p element's end tag:
"A p element's end tag can be omitted if the p element is immediately
followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset,
footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h
