On 5/31/11, Felix Halim felix.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
The dynamic resources only updated if the user visit the particular
app cached web-page.
Yeah, that's logical. Caches should still be allowed to refetch
Þann mán 30.maí 2011 03:42, skrifaði Felix Halim:
Hmm.. yes, I think unlimited is a bad word (I just use it because
currently App Cache quota is unlimited).
Let me explain my need for pageStorage in a different way:
Suppose I have a web page and want to store it in an App Cache. This
web page
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
The following is how I understand your requirements; please correct me where
correction is due.
You've got two types of resources:
1. static resources, to be retrieved once and cached indefinitely
2. dynamic
On 5/28/11, Felix Halim felix.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
To summarize, the pageStorage offers unlimited storage for dynamic
content for the App Cached web pages.
User agents may store expired pages for offline use. Internet Explorer
and Firefox have 'Work offline' modes automatically enabled on
Hmm.. yes, I think unlimited is a bad word (I just use it because
currently App Cache quota is unlimited).
Let me explain my need for pageStorage in a different way:
Suppose I have a web page and want to store it in an App Cache. This
web page requires a few resources (.ccs, .js, images, etc..).
AFAIK, currently there is no storage limit for the App Cache.
However, localStorage does has limit of 5 MB.
It is silly to force the user to install a web page just to get
unlimited localStorage.
I'm thinking why not introduce an unlimited pageStorage that behaves
like App Cache?
The pageStorage
