On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Markus Lanthaler
wrote:
>> > Well, I would say there are several advantages. First of all, JSON-LD
>> is
>> > more flexible and expressive.
>>
>> More flexible and expressive than what?
>
> Than application/microdata+json.
That's a problem right there. It means th
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The only reason there's a MIME type at all (rather than just using
> > > > JSON's directly) was to enable filtering of copy-and-paste and
> > > > drag-and-drop payloads; would
On Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > The only reason there's a MIME type at all (rather than just using
> > > JSON's directly) was to enable filtering of copy-and-paste and
> > > drag-and-drop payloads; would JSON-LD enable that also?
> >
> > Sure, I see no reason why not
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >
> > The only reason there's a MIME type at all (rather than just using
> > JSON's directly) was to enable filtering of copy-and-paste and
> > drag-and-drop payloads; would JSON-LD enable that also?
>
> Sure, I see no reason why not.
Could you give
On Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:18 AM, Ian Hickson wrote.
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [2] instead
> of
> > creating application/microdata+json. The resulting output would be
> more
> > or less the same.
>
> It wasn
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>
> I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [2] instead of
> creating application/microdata+json. The resulting output would be more
> or less the same.
It wasn't. What would be the purpose of doing so?
The only reason there's a MIME
Hi all,
I just sent this e-mail in response to Michael[tm] Smith's request [1] to
register application/microdata+json to ietf-types but I think this is a
better place to discuss this... so sorry for the cross-post.
I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [2] instead of
creating a
