On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Tyler Keating wrote:
Imagine this: An HTML based document ZIP compressed into a single file could
be uploaded as is to the server. Clicking on a link to the file would
probably download, decompress and open the file in the browser seamlessly and,
even better,
2008/5/13 Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MHTML with a gzip transfer encoding seems like it would do this pretty
nicely already, no?
Indeed, this would belong in another specification.
Yeah, sounds like something for the HTTP layer - what the user-agent
will accept.
- d.
On May 5, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Ben Ward wrote:
On 16 Apr 2007, at 22:03, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
A cross-browser web archive format sounds like a useful thing
From a purely practical perspective, surely support for the data:
URI format solves this problem? The user-agent's ‘Save as Web
Tyler Keating wrote:
On 16-Apr-07, at 3:03 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Tyler Keating wrote:
Hi,
I'm bringing this up again with a different tact, because the more
that I think about it, the more I believe it has the ability to
significantly change the
At 15:45 -0700 23/04/07, Jonas Sicking wrote:
In any event, like Maciej, I think it would be great to have a cross
browser format for this stuff.
Yes. But to be clear, I think widgets and web archives are or may be
slightly different.
A widget package is a distribution package, I
Dave Singer wrote:
At 15:45 -0700 23/04/07, Jonas Sicking wrote:
In any event, like Maciej, I think it would be great to have a cross
browser format for this stuff.
Yes. But to be clear, I think widgets and web archives are or may be
slightly different.
A widget package is a
2007/4/17, Jon Barnett:
The main gripe about [MHTML] was that binary data is base64 encoded,
which adds size to the file in the end.
And which is a wrong assumption.
Binary data can be sent with Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary.
zipping the final MHTML file could help with size.
I hope
On 4/17/07, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/4/17, Jon Barnett:
The main gripe about [MHTML] was that binary data is base64 encoded,
which adds size to the file in the end.
And which is a wrong assumption.
Binary data can be sent with Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary.
True.
, April 16, 2007 11:39 PM
To: Tyler Keating
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Web Documents off the Web (was Web Archives)
Hi Tyler,
I like the idea very much, for instance for having a copy of the CSS
spec on my laptop without the need of an Internet connection while
commuting
- When
On 4/17/07, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope you're talking about GZip or BZip2, not application/zip…
Doesn't matter to me - I just figure some sort of compression would help,
and it would probably help if that compression was supported by browsers, so
gzip sounds right.
The
Hi,
I'm bringing this up again with a different tact, because the more
that I think about it, the more I believe it has the ability to
significantly change the perception and application of HTML and I
would really like to keep the discussion alive. In the previous
thread, I proposed a
On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Tyler Keating wrote:
Hi,
I'm bringing this up again with a different tact, because the more
that I think about it, the more I believe it has the ability to
significantly change the perception and application of HTML and I
would really like to keep the
On 16-Apr-07, at 3:03 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Tyler Keating wrote:
Hi,
I'm bringing this up again with a different tact, because the more
that I think about it, the more I believe it has the ability to
significantly change the perception and
Hi Tyler,
I like the idea very much, for instance for having a copy of the CSS
spec on my laptop without the need of an Internet connection while
commuting
- When I save a page with Safari, Firefox cannot read it.
- When saving stuff with Firefox, I have to deal with both, the HTML
file and
On 4/16/07, Jon Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RFC 2557 was mentioned in the last thread.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2557
After reading it in detail (and indeed writing a script to send HTML with
inline images as attachments), I quite like it. It's simple and obvious
enough and allows
15 matches
Mail list logo
