On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
I have no problem with . type=address would be
very confusing (see what people think about the element
today!), and worse, can legitimately be thought to be for inputting
physical addresses. No one will ever think that type=email is for
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Kristof Zelechovski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Indeed, INPUT[type=email] is confusing as well. I would add [type=address]
> and [type=address-list] as candidates because an e-mail address is the most
> common type of an address on the Web (the e-mail part can be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eduard Pascual
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:28 AM
To: Matthew Paul Thomas
Cc: WHAT working group
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Web forms 2,input type suggestions (Michael A. Puls
II)
What about "multi-
On 10/30/08, Eduard Pascual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> >>
> >> Declare INPUT[type="mailing-list"] instead of INPUT[type="emails"],
> >> please. Type
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
>>
>> Declare INPUT[type="mailing-list"] instead of INPUT[type="emails"],
>> please. Type="emails" is ugly and confusing (as it seems to expect
>> messages).
>>
On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
Declare INPUT[type="mailing-list"] instead of INPUT[type="emails"],
please. Type="emails" is ugly and confusing (as it seems to expect
messages).
...
"emails" is indeed ugly, but "mailing-list" would be even worse. A
mailing list usua
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:46 AM
To: Alex Vincent
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Web forms 2, input type suggestions (Michael A. Puls
II)
We'll probably add type=color soon, and maybe type=emails or some such
some time after that. In general though I agree that we should
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Alex Vincent wrote:
>
> I've held off on commenting about the new types suggested for input so
> far, but I should mention this: Web Forms 2 as it currently stands has
> twenty-four different types of input elements. Ten from HTML 4,
> fourteen new ones in this spec. Plea
I've held off on commenting about the new types suggested for input so far,
but I should mention this: Web Forms 2 as it currently stands has
twenty-four different types of input elements. Ten from HTML 4, fourteen
new ones in this spec. Please, please, don't overload it any more than is
absolu
