Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
I honestly don't think the property values are well-named. either is
confusing and vague; dont-want is a misspelled colloquialism. How
about one of the following possibilities:
captions: wanted
captions: unwanted
captions: no-preference
What happened to yes, no,
At 0:02 -0400 10/06/07, Brian Campbell wrote:
On Jun 9, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Dave Singer wrote:
I have to confess I saw the BBC story about sign-language soon
after sending this round internally. But I need to do some study
on the naming of sign languages and whether they have ISO codes.
Is
Dave Singer wrote:
At 16:35 +0100 9/06/07, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
[snip]
The proposal does not describe how conflicts such as the following
would be resolved:
User specifies:
captions: want high-contrast-video: want
Author codes:
video ... source media=all and (captions:
I wrote:
The crudest way of doing this would be to provide transcriptions of
audio descriptions to supplement the captions. I believe one can do that
with SMIL; I don't know what the situation with other container formats
or player UIs is however.
I just ran across the Open and Closed
Dave Singer wrote:
we promised to get back to the whatwg with a proposal for a way to
handle accessibility for timed media, and here it is. sorry it took a
while...
Three cheers for Apple for trying to tackle some of the accessibility
issues around video content! :) Without trying to assess
At 16:35 +0100 9/06/07, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Dave Singer wrote:
we promised to get back to the whatwg with a proposal for a way to
handle accessibility for timed media, and here it is. sorry it
took a while...
Three cheers for Apple for trying to tackle some of the
accessibility
On Jun 9, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Dave Singer wrote:
I have to confess I saw the BBC story about sign-language soon
after sending this round internally. But I need to do some study
on the naming of sign languages and whether they have ISO codes.
Is it true that if I say that the human language
