On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Chris Coyier wrote:
>
> I'm hoping for more a little bit more control over s. We have
> which is pretty fantastic right now. I'd like to see
> some possibilities in both directions (more and less strict).
>
> More strict:
> - Disallow modal dialogs (e.g. alert, confirm) b
> I'm hoping for more a little bit more control over s. We have
>> which is pretty fantastic right now. I'd like to see some
>> possibilities in both directions (more and less strict).
>>
>> More strict:
>> - Disallow modal dialogs (e.g. alert, confirm) but otherwise allowing
>> scripts via all
Hi Chris,
Le 06/02/2014 16:54, Chris Coyier a écrit :
Hey folks. Long time listener, first time caller.
Thanks for participating :-)
I'm hoping for more a little bit more control over s. We have
which is pretty fantastic right now. I'd like to see some
possibilities in both directions (more
This sounds like an interesting idea, but I think it would quite easily get
out of hand if people wanted some options from More Strict but not all of
them, there would probably need to be a finer control of permissions.
~ Shane Hudson
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Chris Coyier wrote:
> Hey f
Hey folks. Long time listener, first time caller.
I'm hoping for more a little bit more control over s. We have
which is pretty fantastic right now. I'd like to see some
possibilities in both directions (more and less strict).
More strict:
- Disallow modal dialogs (e.g. alert, confirm) but othe
