Re: [whatwg] lang versus xml:lang

2007-10-30 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > I start to think that lang="" should also be allowed in XML documents. > xml:lang is nice, but if you don't have knowledge of the HTML namespace > knowing the language of certain constructs isn't that valuable. It would > also make HTMLElement.la

Re: [whatwg] lang versus xml:lang

2007-03-04 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 5 mars 2007 à 08:17, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : It would also make HTMLElement.lang useful for XML documents... (And user agents have to support and support this stuff already too.) Interesting. which supports for which user agents? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conf

Re: [whatwg] lang versus xml:lang

2007-03-04 Thread Simon Pieters
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:17:56 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yup. I start to think that lang="" should also be allowed in XML documents. xml:lang is nice, but if you don't have knowledge of the HTML namespace knowing the language of certain constructs isn't that valuab

[whatwg] lang versus xml:lang

2007-03-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:25:51 +0100, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And today the base element already works in at least FFox and Opera also when content is sent as true XHTML 1.0, so this would not really change anything but the spec. Yup. I start to think that lang="" should also be a