Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
- Processing a reply synchronously is awkward in any case, since you need
a callback.
I'm not sure I follow this argument, I actually come to the opposite
conclusion.
Say
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Kasting wrote:
I think the argument assumed you were communicating with a single frame in
the common case, in which case the current API is more awkward than one in
which the postMessage() call itself returns the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
- Processing a reply synchronously is awkward in any case, since you need
a callback.
I'm not sure I follow this argument, I actually come to the opposite
conclusion.
Say that a page is
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Ojan Vafai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the tradeoff is still worth it, though. And in the future, with
something like Hixie's messaging proposal, this problem will go away
(because you'll have stateful objects that represent a conversation).
I don't
Hi!
I agree with everything Maciej said, but I'm rather impartial.
The word post implies posting something to a queue of messages, like
we've seen in other programming APIs.
There are use cases for both sync and async API, so we should support
both. We could have either a new parameter for
So one thing I should note first of all is that the implementation that
is currently in the Firefox 3 betas are synchronous. It is unlikely that
we can get this changed by final shipping since we are more or less in
code freeze already.
Of course, we implemented this knowing that it's part of
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Processing a reply synchronously is awkward in any case, since you need
a callback.
I'm not sure I follow this argument, I actually come to the opposite
conclusion.
Say that a page is communicating with multiple
Peter Kasting wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Processing a reply synchronously is awkward in any case, since
you need a callback.
I'm not sure I follow this argument, I actually come to the opposite
conclusion.
Say
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Sunava Dutta wrote:
Just following up to my email a few weeks back regarding cross document
messaging.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2008Feb/0024.html
We'd love to know whether our proposed changes here (in the rewrite) can
be accepted or
