Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-07-15 Thread Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 22:56 + schrieb Ian Hickson: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: I am unsure on what scope the current document should have in subsection 5.11.3.9 (Link type license) of the spec and how it functions (or should play) together with

Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-07-15 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 22:56 + schrieb Ian Hickson: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: I am unsure on what scope the current document should have in subsection 5.11.3.9 (Link type license) of the spec and how it

Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-07-15 Thread Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2009, 01:36 + schrieb Ian Hickson: On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: Creative Commons suggests using 'about=' in RDFa with 'rel=license' http://wiki.creativecommons.org/RDFa#Content_discovery It is an example of RDFa and HTML semantics clashing

Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-07-15 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: http://daten.dieweltistgarnichtso.net/src/cc-license-markup/generator2.xhtml Wow, sweet! Aside from english language support, have I missed something obvious building this license thingy ? The first image I tried was this one:

Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-07-15 Thread Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2009, 04:17 + schrieb Ian Hickson: The first image I tried was this one: http://hixie.ch/resources/images/astrophy/200 ...which didn't work, but I see now that it is because I was lacking an extension on the filename. Well, checking the MIME type seemed

Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: I am unsure on what scope the current document should have in subsection 5.11.3.9 (Link type license) of the spec and how it functions (or should play) together with sectioning. Let us consider this example, a creative-commons-licensed

Re: [whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-04-28 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: As there hasn't been any answer (not even a negative) to my question / proposal I plan to address a bunch of licensing-related issues together later this week. You can see the use cases I have collected so far here:

[whatwg] scope of link type license

2009-04-16 Thread Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Hello everyone, I am unsure on what scope the current document should have in subsection 5.11.3.9 (Link type license) of the spec and how it functions (or should play) together with sectioning. Let us consider this example, a creative-commons-licensed video: figure video src=foo.ogg/