Re: [whatwg] script type= and style type= parsing

2007-06-12 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:36:06 +0200, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, I've defined (to some extent) the processing of type= and language=. I'm not really sure exactly what more to say. If we get into much more detail, we'll start having to define the difference between JS1.0, 1.1,

Re: [whatwg] script type= and style type= parsing

2007-06-12 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Hmm. I hope this will be defined by someone at some point. Well, at least the version switches that are important for interoparability. Me too. If you have an editor who has the time to work this out, the WebAPI WG is probably the best place for

Re: [whatwg] script type= and style type= parsing

2007-06-11 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Based on http://testsuite.org/html/elements/script/001.htm and http://testsuite.org/html/elements/style/001.htm and the results in Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera it seems parsing can be made pretty strict. The only real problem is script

Re: [whatwg] script type= and style type= parsing

2006-05-22 Thread Joost 'AlthA' de Valk
I've tested those two tests in WebKit nightly, and see that webkit fails a few more than firefox does. I would be very interested in some statistics as well :). Kind regards, Joost On May 21, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Based on