Re: [whatwg] several messages about the versioning feature in the SQL API

2007-10-17 Thread Brady Eidson
On Oct 17, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Brady Eidson wrote: I think `bool changeVersion()` has a deficient design, and the content of its description - combined with the lack of clarity around "active" and "open" transactions - makes implementing it even more

Re: [whatwg] several messages about the versioning feature in the SQL API

2007-10-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Oct 17, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: But I also have some confusion about the actual intention of the method. The line that is the source of most confusion - "When the method is invoked, the user agent must obtain a full lock of the database (waiting for all open transactions

Re: [whatwg] several messages about the versioning feature in the SQL API

2007-10-17 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Brady Eidson wrote: > > I think `bool changeVersion()` has a deficient design, and the content > of its description - combined with the lack of clarity around "active" > and "open" transactions - makes implementing it even more dubious. > > First off, it is synchronous. Fixed