On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Roger H�gensen wrote:
On my own site currently I mostly replicate the first paragraph of an
article in my journal as the meta description, and write one up for
other pages, usually replicating some of the content.
I'm both looking for and want a solution to avoid
On 2010-03-19 17:19, Roger Hågensen wrote:
On 2010-03-19 15:43, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:43 +0100, Roger Hågensen wrote:
On 2010-03-19 15:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I just feel that thehead andbody areas of a page have two
distinct uses, and unnecessary crossovers
On 2010-03-18 10:04, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
The main problem with that would be that parsers would then need to
read into the body of the page to produce a description of your
site. This might not produce much of an overhead on a one-off basis,
but imagine a parser that is grabbing the
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 13:43 +0100, Roger Hågensen wrote:
On 2010-03-18 10:04, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
The main problem with that would be that parsers would then need to
read into the body of the page to produce a description of your
site. This might not produce much of an overhead on a
On 2010-03-19 15:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Search engines and people are not the only content parsers. Sure, you
would expect a parser to maybe look further into the content if the
description meta tag was missing, but imagine if a parser had to do
this for all the content it looked at? There
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:43 +0100, Roger Hågensen wrote:
On 2010-03-19 15:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Search engines and people are not the only content parsers. Sure, you
would expect a parser to maybe look further into the content if the
description meta tag was missing, but imagine if
On 2010-03-19 15:43, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:43 +0100, Roger Hågensen wrote:
On 2010-03-19 15:17, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Search engines and people are not the only content parsers. Sure, you
would expect a parser to maybe look further into the content if the
On 2010-03-18 03:37, Roger Hågensen wrote:
I know, replying to myself is a big no-no... *cough*
I searched the list, and looked at the HTML5 briefly and found
nothing, nor can I ever recall such.
So this is both a question and a proposal.
On my own site currently I mostly replicate the first
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 03:37 +0100, Roger Hågensen wrote:
I searched the list, and looked at the HTML5 briefly and found nothing,
nor can I ever recall such.
So this is both a question and a proposal.
On my own site currently I mostly replicate the first paragraph of an
article in my
On 18.03.2010 03:37, Roger Hågensen wrote:
I searched the list, and looked at the HTML5 briefly and found nothing,
nor can I ever recall such.
So this is both a question and a proposal.
On my own site currently I mostly replicate the first paragraph of an
article in my journal as the meta
I searched the list, and looked at the HTML5 briefly and found nothing,
nor can I ever recall such.
So this is both a question and a proposal.
On my own site currently I mostly replicate the first paragraph of an
article in my journal as the meta description,
and write one up for other pages,
11 matches
Mail list logo
