On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:42:13 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Philip, all,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:21:45 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
My itext wasn't supposed to
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:21:45 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Philip,
It's great to see further specifications come up around captions. I do
think we need these to make progress and come to a specification that
we can all agree on.
I just wanted to add a comment on
Philip, all,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:21:45 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
My itext wasn't supposed to stay a JavaScript implementation. In
fact, it had the exact same purpose as your ovelay
As part of the work in the W3C HTML Accessibility Task Force I have
proposed a new overlay element to handle several use cases which are
currently not solved by HTML5 video.
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Video_Overlay
Certainly we shouldn't be adding this to HTML5 at this point, but I think
Philip,
It's great to see further specifications come up around captions. I do
think we need these to make progress and come to a specification that
we can all agree on.
I just wanted to add a comment on your wiki page for clarification:
My itext wasn't supposed to stay a JavaScript
