Le 2007-04-17 à 13:05, Kristof Zelechovski a écrit :
Methinks we could easily overcome the semantic problems with the
dialogue
element if we renamed it to transcript.
The problem I described is not about the meaning of dialog, it's
about structuring its content to accomodate various uses.
On 4/10/07, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Marks wrote:
I think the dialog example is a retrograde step. The
olliciteq|blockquote pattern seems much better than redefining
dt and dd, which will confuse XOXO parsers that try to be
Postelian. Did I miss some reasoning
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:13 -0700, Kevin Marks wrote:
My point is that this is breaking the expected containment of dtdd
in a dl- if you want a new structure purely for dialog, define
speaker and keep q. I really fail to see why redefining a
definition list as speech is less 'proper' than
On 4/8/07, Elliotte Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
So I propose a sl element (sequential list) which can be used to
replace dialog as well as other things. The proposal can be found here:
Sounds a little redundant with ol (ordered list). Also sounds needlessly
Kevin Marks wrote:
I think the dialog example is a retrograde step. The
olliciteq|blockquote pattern seems much better than redefining
dt and dd, which will confuse XOXO parsers that try to be
Postelian. Did I miss some reasoning here?
Fictional dialogs don't involve the excerpt and citation
Le 2007-04-05 à 10:36, Simon Pieters a écrit :
I get a 404 for this URI.
Oops... sorry.
http://www.michelf.com/documents/whatwg/sequential-list/
Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michelf.com/
