Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-16 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:58:30 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ian, Great to see the new efforts to move the subtitle/caption/karaoke issues forward! I actually have a contract with Mozilla starting this month to help solve this, so I am more than grateful that you

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-16 Thread David Singer
Thanks for the analysis, but two pieces of feedback: 1) Though sub-titles and captions are the most common accessibility issue for audio/video content, they are not the only one. There are people: -- who cannot see, and need audio description of video -- who cannot hear, and prefer sign

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-16 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:31 PM, David Singersin...@apple.com wrote: Thanks for the analysis, but two pieces of feedback: 1) Though sub-titles and captions are the most common accessibility issue for audio/video content, they are not the only one.  There are people:  -- who cannot see, and

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-16 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedtphil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:58:30 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: 3. Timed text stored in a separate file, which is then parsed by the user agent and rendered as part of the video automatically by

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-16 Thread David Singer
At 23:28 +1000 16/07/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: 2) I think the environment can and should help select and configure type-1 resources, where it can. It shouldn't need to be always a manual step by the user interacting with the media player. That is, I don't see why we cannot have the

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-16 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:56 PM, David Singersin...@apple.com wrote: At 23:28  +1000 16/07/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:   2) I think the environment can and should help select and configure type-1  resources, where it can.  It shouldn't need to be always a manual step by  the user

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-15 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote: A flying thought: why not thinking also to a further option for embedding everything in a sort of all-in-one html page generated on the fly when downloading, making of it a global container for video and text to be consumed by UAs

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-15 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: 6. Timed text stored in a separate file, which is then fetched and parsed by the Web page, and which is then rendered by the Web page. For case 6, while it works for deaf people, we actually create an accessibility nightmare for blind people

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2009-07-15 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Hi Ian, Great to see the new efforts to move the subtitle/caption/karaoke issues forward! I actually have a contract with Mozilla starting this month to help solve this, so I am more than grateful that you have proposed some ideas in this space. On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Ian

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-27 Thread Ian Hickson
I have carefully read all the feedback in this thread concerning associating text with video, for various purposes such as captions, annotations, etc. Taking a step back as far as I can tell there are two axes: where the timed text comes from, and how it is rendered. Where it comes from, it

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-27 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Hi Ian, Thanks for taking the time to go through all the options, analyse and understand them - especially on your birthday! :-) Much appreciated! I agree with your analysis and the 6 options you have identified. However, I disagree slightly with the conclusions you have come to - mostly from a

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-27 Thread Calogero Alex Baldacchino
Silvia Pfeiffer ha scritto: Hi Ian, Thanks for taking the time to go through all the options, analyse and understand them - especially on your birthday! :-) Much appreciated! Than, happy birthday to Ian! [...] The only real issue that we have with separate files is that the captions may

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-11 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Another implementation comes from the W3C TimedText working group: They have a test suite for DFXP files at http://www.w3.org/2008/12/dfxp-testsuite/web-framework/START.html . Philippe just announced that he added HTML5 video tag support using the javascript file that Jan had written for srt

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-10 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
And now we have a first demo of the proposed syntax in action. Michael Dale implemented SRT support like this: video src=sample_fish.ogg poster=sample_fish.jpg duration=26 text category=SUB lang=en type=text/x-srt default=true title=english SRT subtitles

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-10 Thread Michael Dale
Yea as Silvia outlines in the intro to this thread we will likely continue to see external timed text files winning out over muxed timed text. Its just more flexible ... Javascript embedding libraries which are widely used today for flash video will be even more widely used with the emerging

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-10 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 21:33 +1300 9/12/08, Robert O'Callahan wrote: For what it's worth, loading an intermediate document of some new type which references other streams to be loaded adds a lot of complexity to the browser implementation.

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-10 Thread Dave Singer
At 14:40 +1300 11/12/08, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Dave Singer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 21:33 +1300 9/12/08, Robert O'Callahan wrote: For what it's worth, loading an intermediate document of some new type which references other

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Ralph Giles
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Martin Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My concern is that if the only thing linking the various streams together is the HTML document then the streams are less useful outside of a web browser context. Absolutely. This proposal places an additional burden on the

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
I heard some complaints about there not being any implementation of the suggestions I made. So here goes: 1. out-of-band There is an example of using srt with ogg in a out-of-band approach here: http://v2v.cc/~j/jquery.srt/ You will need Firefox3.1 to play it. The syntax of what Jan implemented

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Calogero Alex Baldacchino
Silvia Pfeiffer ha scritto: I heard some complaints about there not being any implementation of the suggestions I made. So here goes: 1. out-of-band There is an example of using srt with ogg in a out-of-band approach here: http://v2v.cc/~j/jquery.srt/ You will need Firefox3.1 to play it. The

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Calogero Alex Baldacchino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, the use of subtitles in conjunction with screen readers might be problematic: a deeper synchronization with the media might be needed in order to have the text read just during voice pauses, to describe

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Also, for those interested, metavid and mv_embed are examples of use of ROE: http://metavid.org/w/index.php/Mv_embed Metavid uses video roe=my_roe_file.xml for clean remote embedding of multiple text/video/audio tracks in a single xml encapsulation. An example of such embeds is here:

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Calogero Alex Baldacchino
Silvia Pfeiffer ha scritto: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Calogero Alex Baldacchino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, the use of subtitles in conjunction with screen readers might be problematic: a deeper synchronization with the media might be needed in order to have the text read just

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-09 Thread Dave Singer
At 21:33 +1300 9/12/08, Robert O'Callahan wrote: For what it's worth, loading an intermediate document of some new type which references other streams to be loaded adds a lot of complexity to the browser implementation. It creates new states that the decoder can be in, and introduces new

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-08 Thread Martin Atkins
Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Take this as an example: video src=http://example.com/video.ogv; controls text category=CC lang=en type=text/x-srt src=caption.srt/text text category=SUB lang=de type=application/ttaf+xml src=german.dfxp/text text category=SUB lang=jp type=application/smil

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-08 Thread Ralph Giles
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Martin Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the advantages of doing this directly in HTML rather than having the src attribute point at some sort of compound media document? The general point here is that subtitle data is in current practice often created

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-08 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Martin Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Take this as an example: video src=http://example.com/video.ogv; controls text category=CC lang=en type=text/x-srt src=caption.srt/text text category=SUB lang=de type=application/ttaf+xml

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-08 Thread Martin Atkins
Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: I'm interested to hear people's opinions on these ideas. I agree with Ralph and think having a simple, explicit mechanism at the html level is worthwhile - and very open and explicit to a web author. Having a redirection through a ROE-type file on the server is more

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-08 Thread Nils Dagsson Moskopp
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 21:20 -0800 schrieb Martin Atkins: My concern is that if the only thing linking the various streams together is the HTML document then the streams are less useful outside of a web browser context. If there is a separate resource containing the description of how