Re: [whatwg] Joe Clark's Criticisms of the WHATWG and HTML 5

2007-03-24 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:08:16 +0100, Nicholas Shanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How does that help anyone? Putting them in a custom XML vocabulary drops all semantics directly. (Unless a search engine does some heuristics on element names I suppose.) Custom XML vocabularies are really not

Re: [whatwg] Time and Date

2007-03-24 Thread Matthew Raymond
Colin Lieberman wrote: Matthew Raymond wrote: I support the time element for the opposite reason, in fact. I don't want to see authors styling the date format. I'd rather see the date format localized or customized to a user preference. If the author wants it in a specific format, they can

[whatwg] datetime - dateTime

2007-03-24 Thread Anne van Kesteren
The dateTime DOM attribute is spelled with an uppercase T: http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-HTML/html.html#ID-79359609 -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Apple Proposal for Timed Media Elements

2007-03-24 Thread Kevin Marks
On 3/21/07, Chris Double [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looping is useful for more presentational uses of video. Start and end time are useful in case you want to package a bunch of small bits of video in one file and just play different segments, similar to the way content authors sometimes have

Re: [whatwg] Codecs (was Re: Apple Proposal for Timed Media Elements)

2007-03-24 Thread Maik Merten
Kevin Marks schrieb: Now, if you want a fallback standard that is genuinely widely interoperating without patent issues, you could pick QuickTime with JPEG video frames and uncompressed audio. Millions of digital cameras support this format already, as do all quicktime implementations back to

Re: [whatwg] video element feedback

2007-03-24 Thread Ralph Giles
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:33:39PM -0700, Eric Carlson wrote: Yes, the UA needs the offset/chunking table in order to calculate a file offset for a time, but this is efficient in the case of container formats in which the table is stored together with other information that's needed

Re: [whatwg] video element feedback

2007-03-24 Thread Ralph Giles
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:57:45AM -0700, Kevin Marks wrote: How does one seek a Vorbis file with video in and recover framing? It looks like you skip to an arbitrary point and scan for 'OggS' then do a 64kB CRC to make sure this isn't a fluke. Then you have some packets that correspond to

Re: [whatwg] video element feedback

2007-03-24 Thread Maik Merten
Geoffrey Sneddon schrieb: That sort of info is held within the container, so everything within Ogg (so both Theora and Dirac) will suffer from it. H.264 being part of the MPEG-4 standard follows what Kevin Marks said: On 24 Mar 2007, at 08:57, Kevin Marks wrote: 2. define a chunk/offset

[whatwg] Cross-domain components

2007-03-24 Thread Henrik Gulbrandsen
Hello, I've been trying to find a solution to a general cross-domain component integration problem. Unfortunately, I have to conclude that not only is this mostly unsupported by the existing generation of browsers, but even the current WA1 draft misses the mark. Comments on this are welcome!