[whatwg] postMessage and serialization

2008-02-11 Thread Aaron Boodman
Has the topic of automatic serialization and deserialization of objects passed across postMessage() come up already? It seems like boolean, number, string, arrays, and objects should be supported. I realize that you can just use a json library, but I wonder why we should force every application

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 vs. XHTML 2.0

2008-02-11 Thread Charles
How should advertisements be marked up? blink -- Charles

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 vs. XHTML 2.0

2008-02-11 Thread Brian Smith
Ian Hickson wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Henri Sivonen wrote: Anyway, I do think it's a problem for styling, automatic content extraction and non-CSS presentation that HTML lacks the markup for indicating which parts of the page are content proper and which are navigation and other

Re: [whatwg] html start tag token in the root element phase

2008-02-11 Thread Philip Taylor
On 29/06/2007, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the spec dealt with the html start tag token directly in the root element phase, the parse error in the main phase wouldn't need to be conditional. (Implementations that experience a perf benefit from not mutating the attributes of a

Re: [whatwg] More random comments on the putImageData definition

2008-02-11 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Feb 11, 2008 2:57 PM, Oliver Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 10, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Feb 11, 2008 1:05 PM, Oliver Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i was thinking having a style property, say, canvas-dpi: auto|device or something, where the default auto

Re: [whatwg] Calendar subscription as a feed?

2008-02-11 Thread Mikko Rantalainen
Dan Mosedale wrote: Dan Mosedale wrote: One nice property of the webcal: URI scheme is that any user-agent can reasonably infer the intended use (which is likely to carry the semantic that the URI will be around for a longer period of time) simply from the URI. So this URI can simply be

Re: [whatwg] More random comments on the putImageData definition

2008-02-11 Thread Oliver Hunt
On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:33 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: ... I was assuming no-one supported getImageData/putImageData during those 5 years. Then there would be no content using it that would be broken. Alas there are already sites depending on it, so we're doomed On Feb 11, 2008, at

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 vs. XHTML 2.0

2008-02-11 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Brian Smith wrote: How should advertisements be marked up? aside is probably the most appropriate element at the moment. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.