Re: [whatwg] Note on the DETAILS element

2009-09-02 Thread Jeremy Keith
Hixie wrote; The text for details begins with a definition: I assume you mean the text for hgroup. Doh! Yes, I did. You win some, you lose some, I guess: http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2009/html-5-is-a-mess/#comment-618892 I've moved the note to an example, so it's less misleading.

Re: [whatwg] Storage mutex and cookies can lead to browser deadlock

2009-09-02 Thread Darin Fisher
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow

Re: [whatwg] Storage mutex and cookies can lead to browser deadlock

2009-09-02 Thread Drew Wilson
When we had this discussion last, there was significant pushback on this - the argument was basically we have no evidence that cookie-based race conditions *aren't* causing sporadic breakages, which is true. It's inherently difficult to measure. As an aside, I'll note that the majority of pushback

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for local-storage file management

2009-09-02 Thread Jens Alfke
On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: Right now this can be done by the site directly. You mean a download link I can click? Sure, but then the site has no ability to access that data later unless I explicitly locate the file and upload it. That's not the same thing as a storage

Re: [whatwg] Web Storage: apparent contradiction in spec

2009-09-02 Thread Jens Alfke
On Aug 31, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: If you combine that statement with section 6.1's User agents should present the persistent storage feature to the user in a way that does not distinguish them from HTTP session cookies, then the result is that, when the user requests to

Re: [whatwg] Web Storage: apparent contradiction in spec

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Kasting
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote: On Aug 31, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: If you combine that statement with section 6.1's User agents should present the persistent storage feature to the user in a way that does not distinguish them from HTTP

Re: [whatwg] Web Storage: apparent contradiction in spec

2009-09-02 Thread Jens Alfke
On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Peter Kasting wrote: It still seems like you are interpreting this statement as saying that the UA must not allow users to keep/clear cookies separately from Local Storage data. Yes; that seemed the most direct interpretation of its language. While on the

[whatwg] textarea semantics for wrap, readonly, and disabled

2009-09-02 Thread Dirk Pranke
Hi all, In testing various combinations of attributes on textareas, I've found a couple of inconsistencies and some vagueness in the spec. 1) The wrap=hard attribute appears to be defined such that you get hard line breaks at the specified character width of the element, but the semantics of the

Re: [whatwg] textarea semantics for wrap, readonly, and disabled

2009-09-02 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Dirk Prankedpra...@chromium.org wrote: 2) wrap=off does not appear to be a legitimate value, despite being implemented in all the major browsers. Is this an oversight, or an intentional omission? This value is specified down in the rendering section, as it

Re: [whatwg] textarea semantics for wrap, readonly, and disabled

2009-09-02 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Dirk Prankedpra...@chromium.org wrote: 2) wrap=off does not appear to be a legitimate value, despite being implemented in all the major browsers. Is this an oversight, or an intentional

Re: [whatwg] origin+path namespacing and security

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Mike Wilson wrote: My chain of thoughts is something like below (this is just a general picture so don't take it too literally): - invent a more restrictive mechanism for script access between documents from the same origin (host) so it can be limited based on a

Re: [whatwg] object behavior

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote: Here's an example that uses a more modern plug-in that shows what browsers do. window.onload = function() { var obj = document.createElement(object); obj.type = application/x-shockwave-flash; obj.data =

Re: [whatwg] Spec comments, section 4.8

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote: Is The user agent stops fetching the media data before it is completely downloaded really a good description for abort?  It can trigger during the NETWORK_LOADED state, can't it?  

Re: [whatwg] A tag for measurements / quantity?

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote: I can't imagine really seeing enough sites using this to make it worth it, but maybe our experience with time will show this kind of thing is used a lot. On Wed, 19 Aug 2009,

Re: [whatwg] Changing postMessage() to allow sending unentangled ports

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Drew Wilson wrote: I'm saying that we should differentiate between the closed state and cloned state. Implementors effectively need to do this anyway, because the spec says that closed ports are still task sources, while cloned ports are not. It makes sense to be

Re: [whatwg] Web Storage: apparent contradiction in spec

2009-09-02 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote: On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Peter Kasting wrote: It still seems like you are interpreting this statement as saying that the UA must not allow users to keep/clear cookies separately from Local Storage data. Yes; that

Re: [whatwg] EDITORIAL - Suggested corrections

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Kevin Benson wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kevin Benson wrote: 4.10.4.1.17 Radio Button state Either neither a nor b have a form owner, or they both have one and it is the same for both. S//Either

Re: [whatwg] HTML extension for system idle detection.

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, David Bennett wrote: Any instant messaging client, or any client that requires user presence, will use this to keep track of the users idle state. Currently the idle state of a user inside a browser tell tend to be incorrect, and this leads to problems with people

Re: [whatwg] Space characters: VT and FF

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Øistein E. Andersen wrote: As far as I can tell, vertical tab ('\v') is not defined as a space character anymore, but does not cause a parse error either (unlike other control characters). Is this intentional? It seems to cause a parse error... did I miss something?

Re: [whatwg] Space characters: VT and FF

2009-09-02 Thread Øistein E . Andersen
On 3 Sep 2009, at 00:35, Ian Hickson wrote: [Vertical tab] seems to cause a parse error... did I miss something? Sorry, I missed it (all the other characters/ranges seem to be listed in ascending order, so I naïvely expected to find B between 8 and E, not between FDEF and FFFE). --

Re: [whatwg] Element content models

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Schuyler Duveen wrote: There is a use case for hierarchical progress elements: e.g. multiple file uploads (or multiple phases). Consider the following example: progress id=p max=17 value=5 data-units=MB progress id=current-file-progress max=21/progress /progress

Re: [whatwg] The removal of datalist

2009-09-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, tali garsiel wrote: Will this element come back? I think you mean datagrid. It'll probably return once we have it figured out. We removed it because it wasn't mature enough yet. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL

Re: [whatwg] Spec comments, section 4.8

2009-09-02 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote: The user agent stops fetching the media data before it is completely downloaded implies that 1) it cannot occur after the media is completely downloaded, Correct. Okay, then I was reporting the wrong part of the contradiction.

Re: [whatwg] A tag for measurements / quantity?

2009-09-02 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote: I can't imagine really seeing enough sites using this to make it worth it, but maybe our experience with time will show

[whatwg] Spec comments, sections 4.9-4.10

2009-09-02 Thread Aryeh Gregor
In 4.9.11: The rowSpan DOM attribute must reflect the content attribute of the same name. Its default value, which must be used if parsing the attribute as a non-negative integer returns an error, is also 1. What does also refer to? In 4.10.4: It's a little confusing that no visual distinction

[whatwg] Setting document.location.hash to a not-yet-loaded element

2009-09-02 Thread Aryeh Gregor
Consider the following test page: !doctype html titletest/title scriptdocument.location = #frag/script div style=margin-top: 100em/div p id=fragJump to me!/p Observed behavior in both Chrome 4 and Opera 9.6 is that the browser jumps to the given fragment; Firefox 3.5 does not. I believe all