Re: [whatwg] Server-Sent Events parsing issue

2010-10-13 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:41:59 +0200, ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA taka.atsu...@googlemail.com wrote: It's a minor error in the spec in the Server-Sent Events spec. http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/#event-stream-interpretation When processing a line with only data:, the data buffer will be the empty

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread philipj
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:39:43 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/10/2010, at 1:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:00:25 -0700, Jeroen Wijering jer...@longtailvideo.com wrote: On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:24 PM, whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote: Even if very few subtitles use inline SVG, SVG in object, img, iframe, video, self-referencing track, etc in the cue text, all

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:39:43 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/10/2010, at 1:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0700, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [whatwg] WebSRT feedback

2010-10-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:54:53 +0200, phil...@opera.com wrote: I'm making a few assumptions here: Sorry all, my mail client (Opera, hrm) seems to have taken offense to my authoring and discarding of several replies when offline and has punished me by showing them to the world. Please ignore

[whatwg] SearchBox API

2010-10-13 Thread Tony Gentilcore
Hi All, We're adding instant search integration [1] to Google Chrome, allowing the search provider to communicate suggestions to the user agent. If there is interest, we'd like to make sure that we do this in such a way that any search provider or user agent can implement it. While the search

Re: [whatwg] SearchBox API

2010-10-13 Thread a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk
Would it not be best to implement this based in the browser search integration thing that allows people to include a search option to a site through the browser, like YouTube, php.net, etc. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk - Reply message - From: Tony Gentilcore

Re: [whatwg] SearchBox API

2010-10-13 Thread Peter Kasting
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:12 PM, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote: Would it not be best to implement this based in the browser search integration thing that allows people to include a search option to a site through the browser, like YouTube, php.net, etc. I can't

Re: [whatwg] SearchBox API

2010-10-13 Thread イアンフェッティ
I think there might be some confusion with default search / adding search providers. When you add a search provider like YouTube or php.net we just take a URL and expand one template parameter with the search query. With instant search this actually doesn't work because you need to provide the

Re: [whatwg] SearchBox API

2010-10-13 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: I can't for the life of me figure out what you're saying. I assume he's saying that this should be integrated into OpenSearch, rather than being specific to the default search provider as the proposed API seems to be.

Re: [whatwg] SearchBox API

2010-10-13 Thread Peter Kasting
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.comsimetrical%2b...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: I can't for the life of me figure out what you're saying. I assume he's saying that this should be integrated