Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a tab visibility API

2010-12-19 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:27:51 -, Alex Komoroske komoro...@chromium.org wrote: Regarding the fact that background tabs aren't necessarily invisible: - On December 8, Boris Zbarsky wrote: There is no such guarantee for background tabs. For example, browsers may show tab previews in

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a tab visibility API

2010-12-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
(Subscribed recently; sorry for breaking threading.) On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: 2) There is some potential for abuse (e.g. putting up dialogs to make yourself the active tab if you determine that you aren't, though perhaps this is a quality of

Re: [whatwg] Handling unknown 'duration's

2010-12-19 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.comwrote: Agreed, this is how I've interpreted the spec already. If a server replies with 200 OK instead of 206 Partial Content and the duration isn't in the header of the resource, then the duration is reported to be Infinity.