Re: [whatwg] [WHATWG] HTMLElement ids as global object properties

2011-04-04 Thread Randy Drielinger
Funny... IE9 shows true, but only when there's a valid doctype :) -Original Message- From: Boris Zbarsky Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 12:58 AM To: Alexandre Morgaut Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] [WHATWG] HTMLElement ids as global object properties On 4/3/11 12:53

Re: [whatwg] details for long description of image/ video etc

2011-04-04 Thread Bruce Lawson
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:40:30 +0100, John Foliot fol...@wats.ca wrote: One of the largest problems with longdesc is/was that HTML4 did not clearly articulate how user-agents should interact with the attribute (expectations), so browsers did nothing. Let's learn from our earlier mistakes.

Re: [whatwg] details for long description of image/ video etc

2011-04-04 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-04-02 10:30, John Foliot wrote: Interesting question. Referring to the spec, I think that you may have in fact uncovered a bug in the text. The spec states: The user agent should allow the user to request that the details be shown or hidden. The problem (or potential problem)

Re: [whatwg] details for long description of image/ video etc

2011-04-04 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
Lachlan Hunt wrote: If details default Boolean setting of 'hidden' results in the equivalent of CSS's {display:none;} (where the content is taken completely out of the page flow, both visually and in the DOM tree) then this would likely be a possible alternative to @longdesc Yes, it should be

Re: [whatwg] details for long description of image/ video etc

2011-04-04 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 4/4/11, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Yes, it should be implemented equivalent to display:none. Please clarify. You seem to by trying to express it very briefly, at the cost of change of meaning. You don't really mean that the entire details element