On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Aaron Colwell acolw...@google.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
I had imagined that this API would let the author feed in
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-iframe-element.html#attr-iframe-sandbox
Are there plans to have an 'allow-plugins' value?
I'm assuming there will be use-cases where the only protection that is
desired is prevention of parent redirection.
Thanks
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
sandbox flags and a way of confirming that the plugins understand
those bits before we can allow plugins inside sandboxed frames.
Adam
On Wed, Jul 13,
On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote:
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
sandbox flags and a way of confirming that the plugins understand
those bits before we can allow plugins inside
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote:
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent
redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
sandbox flags and a way of
On 2011-07-13 22:58, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschkejulian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote:
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent
redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of
In response to off-list feedback, I've renamed StreamTrack to
MediaStreamTrack to be clearer about its relationship to the other
interfaces.
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Tommy Widenflycht (�~[~O�~Z��~[~X�~[~X�~Z�) wrote:
We are having a bit of discussion regarding the correct behaviour when
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Aaron Colwell acolw...@google.com wrote:
I am open to suggestions. My intent was that the browser would not attempt
to cache any data passed into append(). It would just demux the buffers that
are sent in. When a seek is requested, it flushes whatever it has
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:13:05 +0200, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
Yes, but we can *define* the flag in HTML and write down what it means
with respect to plugin APIs.
It seems much better to wait until it can actually be implemented.
--
Anne van Kesteren
