Backtracking here.
The just do it in script argument saddens me quite a bit. :-(
I don't agree that it is okay to be in a state where web apps have to
depend on script libraries that duplicate the functionality of existing Web
APIs. I mean, we put a lot of effort into avoiding introducing
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
Backtracking here.
The just do it in script argument saddens me quite a bit. :-(
I don't agree that it is okay to be in a state where web apps have to
depend on script libraries that duplicate the functionality of
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
The just do it in script argument saddens me quite a bit. :-(
Agreed, however for this particular case, I'm not sure it makes much
sense to further enshrine a synchronous API for serializing an image.
--
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
The just do it in script argument saddens me quite a bit. :-(
Agreed, however for this particular case, I'm not sure it makes much
sense to
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
The just do it in script argument saddens me quite a bit. :-(
Agreed,
