[whatwg] id and xml:id

2006-04-02 Thread Henri Sivonen
Since UAs handle whitespace in the id attribute inconsistently (see below), old specs imply or require whitespace trimming and ids with whitespace are unreferencable from whitespace-separated lists of ids, I suggest adding the following language concerning document conformance: The value

Re: [whatwg] id and xml:id

2006-04-02 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Quoting Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Also, I suggest requiring that elements must not have both id and xml:id and requiring that xml:id must not occur in the HTML serialization. (Again, from the document conformance point of view-- not disputing requirements on browsers.) How could it

Re: [whatwg] id and xml:id

2006-04-02 Thread fantasai
Henri Sivonen wrote: Since UAs handle whitespace in the id attribute inconsistently (see below), old specs imply or require whitespace trimming and ids with whitespace are unreferencable from whitespace-separated lists of ids, I suggest adding the following language concerning document

Re: [whatwg] id and xml:id

2006-04-02 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Quoting fantasai [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd rather see the id attribute restricted to an NCName token insofar as possible. We can make an exception for Hixie's repetition templates, but otherwise I think it should be compatible with the XML ID syntax. I agree. Note also that the repetition

Re: [whatwg] id and xml:id

2006-04-02 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Apr 2, 2006, at 19:26, Anne van Kesteren wrote: I agree. Note also that the repetition template also allows for characters that are compatible with XML ID. Of course, this is only for valid documents... All things should still be defined in a way that they take into account invalid,

Re: [whatwg] id and xml:id

2006-04-02 Thread fantasai
Henri Sivonen wrote: On Apr 2, 2006, at 18:56, fantasai wrote: I'd rather see the id attribute restricted to an NCName token insofar as possible. We can make an exception for Hixie's repetition templates, but otherwise I think it should be compatible with the XML ID syntax. Do you mean

[whatwg] Textareas

2006-04-02 Thread Csaba Gabor
I've run into some issues with textareas and after checking http://www.w3.org/Submission/web-forms2/ and seeing that the mailing list is active... 1. I always thought that cols, which has been around forever, was advisory regarding width, in the sense that if there was no other overriding