Quoting Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/13/06, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I forget about this hereby a proposal to give the
HTMLMapElement interface a new (readonly) member called `images` or
equivalent representing an HTMLCollection consisting of
HTMLImageElement and
Quoting Shadow2531 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/13/06, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I forget about this hereby a proposal to give the
HTMLMapElement interface a new (readonly) member called `images` or
equivalent representing an HTMLCollection consisting of
HTMLImageElement and
Oistein E. Andersen wrote:
As a first step, I have tried to transform the TeX code used on
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Formula) into HTML5.
This raises some issues, see http://xn--istein-9xa.com/HTML5/WikiTeX.pdf for
all the details. I have tried to follow the current
Oistein E. Andersen wrote:
This issue [font selection] belong to presentational layer and has to be
addressed
on CSS side (there are no problems on XSL and/or DSSSL side as one can make
appropriate transformations).
I am not so sure about that.
In fact I am not sure either.
The
Hi,
I've spoken to a person who is blind about HTML5 and accessibility. I
thought I'd send some of his thoughts to the list.
He is in favor of the new nav and article elements indicating the
navigation section of the page and what is the main content:
yeah that'd be excellent, if screen
Simon Pieters wrote:
I've spoken to a person who is blind about HTML5 and accessibility. I
thought I'd send some of his thoughts to the list.
...
He also says that he accesskeys shouldn't be dropped.
Accesskey implementations need to be seriously improved if they are to
be retained. There's
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:09:43 +0700, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Accesskey implementations need to be seriously improved if they are to
be retained. There's significant evidence to show that there are very
few, if any, safe keys available which don't clash with existing
On Jun 14, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:09:43 +0700, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Accesskey implementations need to be seriously improved if they are
to be retained. There's significant evidence to show that there are
very few, if any, safe
