- Original Message -
From: "Lachlan Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Anne van Kesteren"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WHATWG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] href on an
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
...
...
If we will change model of A from
to something else then it will create implications for parser.
What implications? Changing the formal content model of an element
doesn't change the way a parser needs to work. Ian's example
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Hickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "WHATWG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] href on any element
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 200
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:33:43 +0200, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > It's arguably a very minor improvement,
> >
> > The only benefit I'm aware of is the convenience it provides to authors for
> > hand coding, but that benefit is neg
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Shannon Baker wrote:
> >
> > This is mentioned in the "Security and privacy" section; the third
> > bullet point here for example suggests blocking access to "public"
> > storage areas:
> >
> > http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#user-tracking
>
> I did read t
On 8/28/06, Jim Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 28/08/06, Shannon Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I accept tracking is inevitable but we
> shouldn't be making it easier either.
You have to remember that the WHAT-WG individual is a Google employee,
a company that now relies on accurate track
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:33:43 +0200, Lachlan Hunt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's arguably a very minor improvement,
The only benefit I'm aware of is the convenience it provides to authors
for hand coding, but that benefit is negligible when you consider the
abilities of many authoring tool
Ian Hickson wrote:
It isn't always clear what it would mean, either (consider ,
or ).
If the feature were to be added to Web Apps 2.0 (or other future spec) I
think it would be sensible to limit it to inline, non-interactive,
non-empty elements (e.g. abbr, em, strong, etc.) and a few other
s
On 28/08/06, Shannon Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I accept tracking is inevitable but we
shouldn't be making it easier either.
You have to remember that the WHAT-WG individual is a Google employee,
a company that now relies on accurate tracking of details, so don't be
surprised that any pro
Keryx webb wrote:
Shut me up and give me a link if this has been discussed before, but I
can't find it on Google. Has there been any discussion of allowing the
href-attribute in (almost) any element, as in XHTML 2.0?
Personally I think this is the one killer feature of XHTML 2 and I would
soo
10 matches
Mail list logo
