- Original Message -
From: Daniel Glazman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WHATWG [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Raymond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] href attribute
On 11/03/2007 05:59, Andrew Fedoniouk
On Mar 10, 2007, at 11:03 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
It is idealistic because, say, if you will put following in
your .htaccess:
AddType foo/bar .html
If I AddType application/xhtml+xml .html to a .htaccess file, it
causes browsers to interpret my html as XHTML. Browsers might ignore
Le Sun, 11 Mar 2007 02:45:18 +0200, Alexey Feldgendler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Not necessarily. For a long time, Microsoft has been in a position where
they benefit from the lack of interoperability with other browsers. They
had no incentive to make their browser standards-compliant.
mozer wrote:
[[
common.inner.strict-inline =
( text )
]]
appear twice in the html file
If you're referring to 5.6.2.1 Common Content Models, it's
...strict-inline and ...struct-inline (unless this has been fixed
since you read it).
--
David Håsäther
Ach Mensch !!
Two in a row !!
Hope the last two would help...
Thanks David²
On 3/11/07, David Håsäther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mozer wrote:
[[
common.inner.strict-inline =
( text )
]]
appear twice in the html file
If you're referring to 5.6.2.1 Common Content Models, it's
From implementing parts of the input stream (section 8.2.2 as of
writing) yesterday, I found several issues (some of which will show
the asshole[1] within me):
- Within the step one of the get an attribute sub-algorithm it says
start over – is this start over the sub-algorithm or the
On 11/03/2007 13:11, Mihai Sucan wrote:
Yes I understand that, however I am skeptical about Microsoft Internet
Explorer. I do not really believe they stopped wanting to dominate the
web browsers market, and suddenly they'll just make a good web browser.
They will create lockins, traps, and
Le Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:35:09 +0200, Daniel Glazman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Just as a reminder, and I am an old monkey in the world of standards
bodies, a standard body is not only a cool place where friendly geeks
meet, drink (sometimes) free beer, and write standards for the beauty
of
* L. David Baron wrote:
My dismissal of XHTML is that the designers of XHTML and related
standards are repeatedly introducing more and more incompatibility
between XHTML and HTML, which makes it progressively harder for
authors to transition to XHTML (particularly to do so gradually on a
large
On Sunday 2007-03-11 18:26 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* L. David Baron wrote:
My dismissal of XHTML is that the designers of XHTML and related
standards are repeatedly introducing more and more incompatibility
between XHTML and HTML, which makes it progressively harder for
authors to
- Original Message -
From: Robert Brodrecht
To: Andrew Fedoniouk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Using the HTML5 DOCTYPE as a new quirksmode switch
On Mar 10, 2007, at 11:03 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
It is idealistic because, say,
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:03:02 +0100, Daniel Glazman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case not all a's are hyperlinks so for your meaning of
semantic they should also not be automatically hyperlinks (or anchors
if you wish). I am pretty sure that existence of 'href' attribute is
what creates
On Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 08:52:36PM +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:03:02 +0100, Daniel Glazman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case not all a's are hyperlinks so for your meaning of semantic
they should also not be automatically hyperlinks (or anchors if you wish).
I am
suppose one is building a GUI with solely canvas elements.
i suppose i should have researched canvas - it looks like it doesn't have
elemnts one might be faimilar with the Tk canvas - you can only draw using
javascript. are there plans to support html style creation of elements within
the
On Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 09:30:58PM +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:27:14 +0100, carmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
suppose one is building a GUI with solely canvas elements. say you have a
doorway, clicking on it opens into the room, which is another page. forcing
this
carmen wrote:
are there plans to support html style creation of elements within the
canvas tag?
How would that be different from Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)???
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
This is not a definition of the a element. In fact, a is defined
as a anchor, not a hyperlink.
I think hyperlink is better in any sense
than anchor as a designation of this entity.
Why? A hyperlink is a relationship BETWEEN to anchors. It can't be an
element
Daniel Glazman wrote:
Indeed. IMO, global |href| gives nothing but more confusion. If we
want to have hyperlinks on block-level elements, it is simpler just
let a and/or other inline elements be legal to wrap block-level
elements.
No, it gives more than that : if |href| becomes global,
On Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 05:06:06PM -0400, Matthew Raymond wrote:
carmen wrote:
are there plans to support html style creation of elements within the
canvas tag?
How would that be different from Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)???
thats kind of what i'm asking, it looks like SVG has its
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:40:18 +0100, Matthew Ratzloff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care about DTD, but DOCTYPE is established, so it seems strange
to trash it in favor of something new when the benefit is questionable
(as
far as I can tell). It is also evident to me that there needs to
- Original Message -
From: Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Glazman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WHATWG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] href attribute
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:03:02 +0100, Daniel Glazman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In
I have had no interest in learning (or teaching) about the Canvas tag since,
from what I can see, it is quite impoverished relative to SVG. And, to boot,
it is not universal across browsers. The browsers that support Canvas,
pretty much already do support, or seem to be close to supporting SVG.
On Sun, March 11, 2007 3:20 pm, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
There needs to be versioning? The web has done great so far without it...
I'm not sure I really see the need.
The Web has done great so far without it? When strict mode was
introduced, all existing websites didn't suddenly start
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Matthew Ratzloff wrote:
On Sun, March 11, 2007 3:20 pm, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
There needs to be versioning? The web has done great so far without
it... I'm not sure I really see the need.
The Web has done great so far without it? When strict mode was
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Mihai Sucan wrote:
Reading about the meta element I found a typo in the Pragma directives
section, Refresh state. [1]
If another meta element in the Refresh state has already been successfully
processed (i.e. when it was inserted the user agent processed it and reached
On Mar 11, 2007, at 02:15 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
The draft of my master's thesis is available for commenting at:
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/thesis/
Henri, congratulations on your work on the HTML conformance checker
and on the Thesis. It's been a truly informative and enlightening
reading,
On 11/03/2007 21:30, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
What does a href=canvas.../canvas/a not offer that canvas
href=.../canvas does?
Code quality... The former is just ugly, really ugly, it smells like
HTML+ from 1993.
/Daniel
On 11/03/2007 22:16, Matthew Raymond wrote:
Why? A hyperlink is a relationship BETWEEN to anchors.
No. Between two resources. Resources can be anchors inside
document instances.
/Daniel
28 matches
Mail list logo
