Hi Charles, Dave,
On 4/10/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On 4/9/07, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Theora video and Vorbis audio in Ogg container. (application/ogg; .ogg)
* Dirac video and Vorbis audio in Ogg container. (application/ogg; .ogg)
*
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:37:31 +0200, Jon Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can think of two possibilities.
One would be to allow the param element as a child of any element (or any
block level element?)
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#param
And then make an attribute of
On 4/10/07, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or allow any attribute that starts with x_ or something (to prevent
clashing with future revisions of HTML), as private attributes.
Instead of starts with x_, how about contains a colon?
A conformance checker could ensure that there is a
At 18:33 +1000 10/04/07, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
Recent discussion at Xiph around http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4281
suggests the use of the following parameters:
# application/ogg; codecs=theora, vorbis for Ogg Theora/Vorbis files
# application/ogg; codecs=theora, speex for Ogg Theora/Speex
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:21:10AM -0700, Dave Singer wrote:
# application/ogg; disposition=moving-image; codecs=theora, vorbis
# application/ogg; disposition=sound; codecs=speex
what is the 'disposition' parameter?
The idea of a 'disposition-type' is to mark content with presentational
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:21:27 +0200, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or allow any attribute that starts with x_ or something (to prevent
clashing with future revisions of HTML), as private attributes.
Instead of starts with x_, how about contains a colon?
A conformance checker could ensure
On 4/10/07, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of starts with x_, how about contains a colon?
A conformance checker could ensure that there is a corresponding xmlns
declaration that applies here, and possibly even do additional
verification if it recognizes the namespace.
An HTML5
On 4/10/07, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:21:27 +0200, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or allow any attribute that starts with x_ or something (to prevent
clashing with future revisions of HTML), as private attributes.
Instead of starts with x_, how
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:41:12 +0200, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How so?
I missed the part where you wanted to change existing HTML parsers. I
thought Hixie pointed out earlier (by means of examples) why we can't have
namespace parsing in HTML. I suppose we can discuss it again...
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:41:12 +0200, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How so?
I missed the part where you wanted to change existing HTML parsers. I
thought Hixie pointed out earlier (by means of examples) why we can't
have namespace parsing in HTML. I suppose we can
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:14:16 +0200, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I missed the part where you wanted to change existing HTML parsers. I
thought Hixie pointed out earlier (by means of examples) why we can't
have namespace parsing in HTML. I suppose we can discuss it again...
It is a
On 4/8/07, Elliotte Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
So I propose a sl element (sequential list) which can be used to
replace dialog as well as other things. The proposal can be found here:
Sounds a little redundant with ol (ordered list). Also sounds needlessly
On 4/6/07, Elliotte Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
How often do we see something like:
pAnimals:/p
ul
liCat/li
liDog/li
liHorse/li
liCow/li
/ul
This would be more meaningful as:
ul
In mozilla we currently don't allow relative URIs in the href at all. If
the uri is relative it is ignored. This is per HTML4, and I think it
would be ok for HTML5 to say the same.
Alternatively it could say that it should be relative to the URI used to
retrieve the base element. In most
On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:21:10AM -0700, Dave Singer wrote:
# application/ogg; disposition=moving-image; codecs=theora, vorbis
# application/ogg; disposition=sound; codecs=speex
what is the 'disposition' parameter?
The idea of a
On 4/11/07, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Ralph Giles wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:21:10AM -0700, Dave Singer wrote:
# application/ogg; disposition=moving-image; codecs=theora, vorbis
# application/ogg; disposition=sound; codecs=speex
what
On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:41:12 +0200, Sam Ruby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How so?
I missed the part where you wanted to change existing HTML
parsers. I thought Hixie pointed out earlier (by means of
examples) why we can't
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:41:12 +0200, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How so?
I missed the part where you wanted to change existing HTML parsers. I
thought Hixie pointed out earlier (by means of
Kevin Marks wrote:
I think the dialog example is a retrograde step. The
olliciteq|blockquote pattern seems much better than redefining
dt and dd, which will confuse XOXO parsers that try to be
Postelian. Did I miss some reasoning here?
Fictional dialogs don't involve the excerpt and citation
19 matches
Mail list logo
