On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:58:21 +0200, MegaZone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I prefer quoted attribute values too, but I don't feel
that strongly about it. I just now that with the quotes optional
someone is going to try to list space separated 'class' names. ;-)
For what it's worth, they
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:21:06 +0200, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:37:46 +0100, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've defined the parsing and conformance requirements in a way that
matches IE. As a side-effect, this has made things like naiumlve
Once upon a time Anne van Kesteren shaped the electrons to say...
For what it's worth, they have _always_ been optional in HTML. And you're
right, some people might do that. In fact, it was done wrong so often for
I know, it was one of the things that used to annoy me in other
author's markup
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
I understand that this is fixed by HTML 5 [...]
Please don't bring up issues we've already fixed. :-)
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\
