Re: [whatwg] BIG Element
Matthew Paul Thomas skrev:
To allow this on the Web, the CSS font-style property would need to have
not just normal, italic, and oblique values, but also an
italic-inverse value. Browsers should then use this value by default
for any inline element where they currently use italic.
No problem!
i {
font-style: italic;
}
i i {
font-style: normal;
}
/* and to be sure */
i i i {
font-style: italic;
}
i i i i {
font-style: normal;
}
However, on the web nestled em seems to be used mostly to add additional
level of emphasis, for which I think this might not be suitable. And
nestled dfn-tags seem absurd to me.
Lars Gunther
Re: [whatwg] several messages about a way to disable referer headers for links
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:27:50 +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dnia 03-11-2007, sob o godzinie 08:42 +, Ian Hickson napisał(a): Ok, I've added a rel value similar to nofollow called noreferer that does this. While we are unable correct the spelling of referer, we certainly need not duplicate it for noreferrer. There must be some end to this self-humiliation. I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the feature affects the Referer (sic) header. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
Re: [whatwg] BIG Element
On Nov 4, 2007, at 5:59 AM, Keryx Web wrote:
Matthew Paul Thomas skrev:
To allow this on the Web, the CSS font-style property would need to
have not just normal, italic, and oblique values, but also an
italic-inverse value. Browsers should then use this value by
default for any inline element where they currently use italic.
No problem!
i {
font-style: italic;
}
i i {
font-style: normal;
}
...
We're getting off-topic here, but ... That wouldn't deitalicize
citei, emi, icite, idfn, iem, or ivar, when it
should. As the levels of nesting increased, the number of permutations
of these elements would explode. And it's not reasonable to expect any
author who uses someblockelement {font-style: italic;} to remember to
also define someblockelement cite, someblockelement dfn,
someblockelement em, someblockelement i, someblockelement var
{font-style: normal}.
Cheers
--
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
Re: [whatwg] BIG Element
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:06:39 -0500, Matthew Paul Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're getting off-topic here, but ... That wouldn't deitalicize
citei, emi, icite, idfn, iem, or ivar, when it
should. As the levels of nesting increased, the number of permutations
of these elements would explode. And it's not reasonable to expect any
author who uses someblockelement {font-style: italic;} to remember to
also define someblockelement cite, someblockelement dfn,
someblockelement em, someblockelement i, someblockelement var
{font-style: normal}.
Going a bit more off-topic, there are people working on solving this
issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007May/0030.html
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
