[whatwg] Tree construction: parse error and plaintext

2008-03-12 Thread Thomas Broyer
In the in body insertion mode, shouldn't the eod-of-file token case have a special handling of if the current node is a plaintext element and not generate a parse error in this case? The current behavior is that if you use plaintext, you'll have a parse error at EOF. Is this intended? -- Thomas

Re: [whatwg] Tree construction: parse error and plaintext

2008-03-12 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:53:52 +0100, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the in body insertion mode, shouldn't the eod-of-file token case have a special handling of if the current node is a plaintext element and not generate a parse error in this case? The current behavior is that if you

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 - comments on 5.6 Command APIs

2008-03-12 Thread Krzysztof Żelechowski
Dnia 11-03-2008, Wt o godzinie 19:31 +, Tom Gilder pisze: On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see no point in returning true when there are no links to remove. IE and Opera currently only return true when the selection contains a link.

[whatwg] Superset encodings [Re: ISO-8859-* and the C1 control range]

2008-03-12 Thread Øistein E . Andersen
On 5th June 2007, Øistein E. Andersen wrote: (To do this properly, what we really ought to do is look for C1 and undefined characters in all IANA charsets and semi-official mappings to Unicode and check 1) whether the gaps can be filled by borrowing from other encodings, and 2) whether

Re: [whatwg] Tree construction: parse error and plaintext

2008-03-12 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Thomas Broyer wrote: In the in body insertion mode, shouldn't the eod-of-file token case have a special handling of if the current node is a plaintext element and not generate a parse error in this case? The current behavior is that if you use plaintext, you'll have a