On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Dave Hodder wrote:
The scope of the license link type in section 4.12.3 seems too narrow
to me. It's presently described like this:
Indicates that the current document is covered by the copyright
license described by the referenced document.
I think the
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Dave Hodder wrote:
The scope of the license link type in section 4.12.3 seems too
narrow
to me. It's presently described like this:
Indicates that the current document is covered by the copyright
license described by the referenced document.
I
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Shannon wrote:
With the capabilities of modern browsers it seems to me that a specific
tag for hyperlinks is no longer required or useful and could be
depreciated with a more versatile global link attribute.
This has been proposed several times but several browser
The correct markup for a link trademark license would be
A HREF=tmlic.html /trade;/A
A trademark license does not apply to a Web page. It may of course apply to
the product described on the page but such information is meaningless to
HTML spiders and publishing tools; information an
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Arne Johannessen wrote:
In particular, we don't want people to use rel=license to point to
trademark licenses or patent licenses that _aren't_ copyright
licenses.
Why not, what's the downside?
It dilutes the point of the feature. The idea is to provide a way for
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Martin Atkins wrote:
That isn't to say that media queries shouldn't be allowed, though, and
if people use them then they should work, if the UA supports them.
Would it not be better to explitly say that media queries are not
appropriate for this, for
Ian Hickson wrote:
In general I agree that attributes are not a scarce resource, but if you
need to add use-specific attributes to a supposedly-generic element I
think that indicates that the generic element is inappropriate for the
use-case.
I disagree. Look at input, for instance.
I
On Wed, 28 May 2008 13:07:50 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm afraid that this could cause trouble (every visitor downloading icon
that's 20–300 times larger than typical favicon). Why not use
rel=application-icon or rel=appicon?
I don't understand the question.
link rel=icon
Hi,
one problem with the online whitelist in cache manifest files is that
it matches on whole URLs only.
This makes embedding for example Google Maps into a web app difficult,
since you want to allow urls like
