And both do not display section headers in MSIE7, making it hard to guess
what you are reading about.
BTW,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:57 PM
To: Aaron Swartz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:38:52 +0200, Aaron Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice there are specs for HTML5 dated today at:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/
diff -u shows a lot of difference, but most are cosmetic. (I gather
they're there
I know many web developers who get upset when they hear that HTML 5 is expected
to become an official reccomendation in 2022.
But as we all know, HTML 5 is already having real world effects and even being
implemented in browsers.
Is there some place that documents the parts of HTML 5 that are
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Brenton Strine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some place that documents the parts of HTML 5 that are already up
and running? Can I use canvas or video? In which browsers?
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-canvas
What other tags can I
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Brenton Strine wrote:
I know many web developers who get upset when they hear that HTML 5 is
expected to become an official reccomendation in 2022.
Yeah, I'm always amused when people get upset over the idea that we might
be able to get two completely bug-free
I've reviewed and digested the latest workers update
(http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-August/015853.html).
I think we're converging :).
There are still a few improvements and simplifications I'd like to
see, however. With these (relatively minor) changes, I'd be really
Thanks guys for the comments!
Language-tagging indeed would be hard.
I've tried to change the portion of the spec to reflect this change, to see
how it would change.
Here is a copy of that part, modified:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dhg4xn62_27c8qfqsgq
I also have a small case study doc on
