://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/2008
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20081112
Rob
--
He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each
I don't quite see why one should betray the size of media data and not
other data. Surely the existance and size of media files on an intranet
could be sensitive information too, so a more general solution is needed
in my opinion. Am I misunderstanding what is being suggested?
Philip
On Wed,
Nov 4, 2008, в 10:08 AM, Aaron Boodman написал(а):
* Add startConversation() to SharedWorker, but rename it connect()
and make the onconnect event fire inside the worker each time it is
called.
What event do you suggest to dispatch in the worker when connect() is
called? From the above,
On Nov 11, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Chris Double wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Biju [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
toKeyFrame - optional, boolean, default false. if true indicates goto
the nearest keyframe of the value provided in secondsToSeek.
this is to improve performance
Consider the following markup:
pobjectpX/p/p
The html5 parsing algorithm produces the following tree:
htmlhead/headbodypobjectpX/pp/p/object/p/body/html
whereas Firefox and Opera both produce:
htmlhead/headbodypobjectpX/p/object/p/body/html
and IE produces:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Garrett Smith wrote:
Unfortunately, we have little choice in the matter. Scripting and XML
both allow you to unambiguously create highly non-conforming DOMs,
e.g. with title elements as the root
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 10, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Should video and audio elements be able to load and play resources
from other origins?
Perhaps Ian thinks not:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6104
There's a to-and-fro discussion here:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An additional, though rather minor problem, is that implementations will
have to delay the loadstart event until it has confirmed that the targeted
file is in fact a real video file, and has confirmed that with relatively
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Wellington wrote:
I've looked at the spec that you have updated, and I think it isn't
clear enough in the text below if either the error should be ignored
(and so don't stop processing the resource, retrying after the
reconnection time) or if the resource should be
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Tommy Thorsen wrote:
Consider the following markup:
pobjectpX/p/p
The html5 parsing algorithm produces the following tree:
htmlhead/headbodypobjectpX/pp/p/object/p/
body/html
whereas Firefox and Opera both produce:
2008/11/12 Alexey Proskuryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nov 4, 2008, в 10:08 AM, Aaron Boodman написал(а):
* Add startConversation() to SharedWorker, but rename it connect()
and make the onconnect event fire inside the worker each time it is
called.
What event do you suggest to dispatch in the
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Garrett Smith wrote:
A script that adds an HTML element to a INPUT element should cause an
hierarchy exception to be raised.
No, it shouldn't.
DOM 1 seems to disagree with that.
You are misreading DOM1 (the type of a node means text node vs element
node, not
Hi,
I have couple of questions about Workers:
1. The sample code looks as
if setTimeout/clearTimeout/setInterval/clearInterval should be available to
Workers (as methods of WorkerUtils?) but they are not explicitly specified
on any interface. Should they be there?
2. It seems workers should be
Tim Starling wrote:
Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Should video and audio elements be able to load and play resources
from other origins?
Perhaps Ian thinks not:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6104
There's a to-and-fro discussion here:
Nov 12, 2008, в 9:26 PM, Aaron Boodman написал(а):
* Add startConversation() to SharedWorker, but rename it connect()
and make the onconnect event fire inside the worker each time it is
called.
What event do you suggest to dispatch in the worker when connect() is
called?
I meant connect.
2008/11/12 Alexey Proskuryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, that's what MessagePort.startConversation() sends, and the proposal
only said that connect() is a renamed startConversation() from Worker (also,
The postMessage() and startConversation() methods on Worker objects must
act as if, when
Nov 13, 2008, в 1:34 AM, Aaron Boodman написал(а):
It doesn't make sense to me that startConversation() would dispatch a
MessageEvent object with name message. If that's what the spec
currently says, I think it should be changed.
The startConversation(message) method is a convenience method
2008/11/12 Alexey Proskuryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The startConversation(message) method is a convenience method that
simplifies create a new MessageChannel and invokingpostMessage() with one of
the new ports. - it doesn't do anything postMessage() couldn't do.
Receivers are supposed to
Nov 13, 2008, в 1:46 AM, Aaron Boodman написал(а):
I feel that it probably is not productive to continue discussing
details when there is disagreement on the large-scale shape of the API
between myself, Jonas, and Hixie.
This is a weird situation indeed, as Firefox seems to be about to ship
(cc'ed whatwg -- sorry if that wasn't what you intended)
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Michael Nordman wrote:
I see... in that case, consider renaming the owner invoked
worker.close() method to use a different verb than self.close()...
worker.stop() or worker.terminate() or worker.kill() or
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Aaron Boodman wrote:
I feel that it probably is not productive to continue discussing details
when there is disagreement on the large-scale shape of the API between
myself, Jonas, and Hixie. My opinion on this detail, for example,
probably varies depending on whether
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote:
[...]
I don't really follow.
Neither do I, and I wrote that :S
Re-reading the conversation, I'm not really sure if I really
understood Joao's issue and proposal correctly; and
Nov 13, 2008, в 3:37 AM, Ian Hickson написал(а):
In general I think the startConversation() issue is a red herring. The
method was added just as a convenience and isn't really needed. I can
remove it if it would make the discussions simpler.
As far as I'm concerned, there is no issue any
23 matches
Mail list logo
