On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:11:55 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
phil...@opera.comwrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:38:32 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Philip
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote:
Might there be a way that script/ tags could add an attribute which
combined the meaning of both defer and document.write, whereby the
last statement was evaluated to a string, but ideally treated, as far as
the DOM, with the string being parsed and
2010-08-11 12:31 EEST: Jonas Sicking:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Mikko Rantalainen
mikko.rantalai...@peda.net wrote:
Stuff I don't want to see (combined with @required):
- first option is always special
- empty string as the value is special
- option without a value is special
Do
On 8/12/2010 4:19 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote:
Might there be a way thatscript/ tags could add an attribute which
combined the meaning of both defer and document.write, whereby the
last statement was evaluated to a string, but ideally treated, as far as
the
I'm perplexed at the resistance. We've tried telling our clients not to use
IE6, IE8 is much faster. But inevitably, we have to make it work.
Mike Wilcox
http://clubajax.org
m...@mikewilcox.net
On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/11/10 9:17 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
On
There exist well tested and respected algorithms to reliably and easily
convert Gregorian calendar dates (and times of day) to a variety of
forms, including Julian Day Numbers (a real (versus integer) count of
the days and fractions of days from some epoch).
Such conversions are not a readily
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/11/10 5:42 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
I think that the sentence The transformations must be performed in
reverse order is sufficient to remove the ambiguity in multiplication
order.
It is? It sounds pretty confusing to me... reverse from what?
I agree that it is
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It's good to have thought this through. I agree, this isn't a workable
solution, since the whole bandwidth switching logic is introduced into the
browsers, when in fact it should happen in the media framework with
On 8/12/10 10:59 AM, David Flanagan wrote:
But if you don't talk about the algebraic operations then you haven't
really defined what a transformation is, have you?
Given that the input is in coordinates, we need to talk about algebraic
operations to define the transformation on vectors those
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Brett Zamir bret...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 8/12/2010 4:19 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Brett Zamir wrote:
Might there be a way thatscript/ tags could add an attribute which
combined the meaning of both defer and document.write, whereby the
last
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The script setting the value doesn't set the dirty flag. The only way this
could be a problem is if the user edits the control and _then_ the script
sets the value to an overlong value.
value
On getting, it must return the
The HTML5 spec doesn't say UAs should treat li value=-1 different
from a negative value specified for any long. For example, a get on
the reflected attribute li.value should return -1. In this test
case:
!doctype html
script
var el = document.createElement(li);
el.setAttribute(value,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
The HTML5 spec doesn't say UAs should treat li value=-1 different
from a negative value specified for any long. For example, a get on
the reflected attribute li.value should return -1. In this test
case:
!doctype
On 8/12/10 4:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
CSS implicitly states that negative list-marker values are allowed, as
negative numbers are discussed in the Lists module. Opera's behavior
should be the correct one here.
Just as a note, Gecko's code to imposing a lower bound of 0 on li
@value goes
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
There seems to be a race condition in how application cache groups are
marked obsolete. Consider the following scenario:
1. A document is loaded from server, an appcache is fully created.
2. Appcache update is initiated (e.g. by calling
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Shwetank Dixit wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:28:55 +0530, Lianghui Chen liac...@rim.com wrote:
In spec HTML5 for offline web application
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#offline) chapter
6.6.6, item 3, 4, 5 state that for resources that is in
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:24:10 +0200, Mike Wilcox m...@mikewilcox.net
wrote:
I'm perplexed at the resistance. We've tried telling our clients not to
use IE6, IE8 is much faster. But inevitably, we have to make it work.
This is not nytimes.com. There's http://whatwg.org/html and
Greetings,
The specification says that the dragenter event is used to determine
whether or not the drop target is to accept the drop. Do functions bound
to this event get any information about the object being dragged? In
particular, is there a good way to have N drop targets, and have each of
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Mike Wilson wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Mike Wilson wrote:
the semantic contract is coming closer and closer to that of the
other storage APIs, so I think it would be an advantage to use the
same interface as well.
I don't see the relevance of storage APIs
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Mihai Parparita wrote:
https://webkit.org/b/42861 has more tests, but briefly, the behavior
in the latest stable versions of these browser is:
- Firefox will not create a session history entry if the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Zachary Ozer z...@longtailvideo.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It's good to have thought this through. I agree, this isn't a workable
solution, since the whole bandwidth switching logic is
Hello all,
I have a couple questions about the storage spec (I'm reading the August 10th
version at (http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/)).
(1) The spec says:
The object's indices of the supported indexed properties are the numbers in
the range zero to one less than the number of key/value
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
These quotas are often global, some kind of user setting, or are
per-origin. Application Caches are missing such a quota.
The entire Disk Space section of Web SQL Databases could equally apply
to Application Caches:
23 matches
Mail list logo
