On 08/30/2011 10:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:38:19 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
In general I think it's better to have functions that deal with child
lists on Node rather than on Element/Document/DocumentFragment.
I think it might still make sense to
On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:40 , James Graham wrote:
On 08/30/2011 10:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:38:19 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
In general I think it's better to have functions that deal with child
lists on Node rather than on
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:58:21 +0200, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
But node.ownerDocument.contains(node) isn't. There's no doubt that
node.inDocument is less error-prone though.
Depends on the use case. The thread started with the document in which
case you want document.contains().
On 29/08/2011, at 7:18 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
In the UndoManager spec http://rniwa.com/editing/undomanager.html,
there are two types of transactions: managed and manual. Managed
transactions are handled by the browser, while manual ones are handled
by the author. The term managed keeps
Le 30 août 2011 à 02:39, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
Or user agent transaction and author transaction. (XMLHttpRequest e.g.
uses author request headers.)
In version UndoManager and DOM Transaction
Proposal Working Draft — 9 August 2011
Suggestion:
A managed transaction is a
Anne,
Le 30 août 2011 à 10:21, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
It's too much complexity for a niche problem.
It is not a niche problem.
* It is in fact an issue for being able to make the website responsive on
Mobile devices in low banwidth.
* It has also the impact that you want to send
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:31:59 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
* It is in fact an issue for being able to make the website responsive
on Mobile devices in low banwidth.
The mobile devices are the ones with the high-resolution displays.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 2011-08-30 16:51, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:31:59 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
* It is in fact an issue for being able to make the website responsive
on Mobile devices in low banwidth.
The mobile devices are the ones with the high-resolution displays.
Le 30 août 2011 à 10:51, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:31:59 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
* It is in fact an issue for being able to make the website responsive on
Mobile devices in low banwidth.
The mobile devices are the ones with the high-resolution
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:18:38 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
Le 30 août 2011 à 10:51, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:31:59 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
* It is in fact an issue for being able to make the website responsive
on Mobile devices in low
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
Le 26 août 2011 à 16:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
If Flickr uses this CSS property, and does so
in different ways in the two places, that's just a Flickr bug.
nope
Flickr offers tools to process images.
Flickr offers
On 30.8.2011 17:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:18:38 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com wrote:
Le 30 août 2011 à 10:51, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:31:59 +0200, Karl Dubost ka...@opera.com
wrote:
* It is in fact an issue for being able to make the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Mn... I've never had that problem. e.g. .net framework uses the term
managed code to mean the code that's garbage-collected by the framework
and unmanaged code to mean the code that manually manage memory among
other
On 11-08-25 7:06 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
- We need to figure out how UndoManager objects affect the bfcache and
the document salvageable flag. Please ping me on IRC about this.
Would you mind sharing the results of that conversation, please (in case
it has happened yet). Thanks!
Ehsan
On 11-08-30 12:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwarn...@webkit.org wrote:
Mn... I've never had that problem. e.g. .net framework uses the term
managed code to mean the code that's garbage-collected by the framework
and unmanaged code to mean the code that
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
- must return the object implementing the UndoManager interface should
probably clarify _which_ object. There's presumably more than one
object in the world implementing this interface. :-)
Oh, yes. I'll clarify
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ehsan Akhgari eh...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 11-08-30 3:15 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
1. Should Transaction have reapply property or not? It appears that
some
of us (e.g. me, Annie, Alex) want it for semantical clarity while
others
(e.g. Jonas and
I'd like to see a new property added to the TextMetrics object from
Canvas 2d.
var t = ctx.measureText('text span');
t == { width: int, baseline: int };
The baseline corresponds to the vertical offset of the anchor point.
A tiny number. It's not the same as height, but it has a similar use.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I'd like to see a new property added to the TextMetrics object from Canvas
2d.
var t = ctx.measureText('text span');
t == { width: int, baseline: int };
The baseline corresponds to the vertical offset of the anchor
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I'd like to see a new property added to the TextMetrics object from Canvas
2d.
var t = ctx.measureText('text span');
t == { width: int,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I'd like to see a new property added to the TextMetrics object from Canvas
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Ehsan Akhgari eh...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 11-08-30 12:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwarn...@webkit.org wrote:
Mn... I've never had that problem. e.g. .net framework uses the term
managed code to mean the code that's
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Ehsan Akhgari eh...@mozilla.com wrote:
Isn't the main difference between the two transactions the fact that the
browser knows how to undo/redo managed transactions, whereas the author
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ehsan Akhgari eh...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 11-08-30 3:15 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
1. Should Transaction have reapply property or not? It appears that
some
of us (e.g. me, Annie,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:04:09 +0200, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I've updated my document: https://rniwa.com/editing/undomanager.html
I clarified which object it should return and also moved undoManager idl
attribute from Element/Document to Node as we have agreed.
I missed this
25 matches
Mail list logo
