On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:16:29 +0100, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
wrote:
Warnings are generally not useful. Either something is fine and we
should
support it, or it's wrong and we should alert the author. I think must
is very much the appropriate requirement level here.
From the
On 3/12/12 11:42 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:16:29 +0100, Charles Pritchard
ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Warnings are generally not useful. Either something is fine and we
should
support it, or it's wrong and we should alert the author. I think
must
is very much the
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:40:26 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com
wrote:
let me first try to summarize what I think the spec says:
* currentTime need not start at 0, for streams it will typically
represent for how long the server has been serving a stream.
* duration is not the
It's my understanding that authors should only apply ARIA via script. The
redundancy cases seem to be the most reasonable use cases I've heard of for
wanting ARIA in the initial markup, but even that seems wrong. What happens
when you have type=range and role=slider, the UA doesn't understand the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The validator is probably just not up to date.
Note that that in this case the validator is probably right. If it's just
presentational, why are you using h2? It doesn't seem presentational to
me. I think you are incorrectly
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:57:57 -, Hugh Guiney hugh.gui...@gmail.com
wrote:
The validator is probably just not up to date.
Note that that in this case the validator is probably right. If it's
just presentational, why are you using h2? It doesn't seem
presentational to me. I think you
2012/3/13 Scott González scott.gonza...@gmail.com:
It's my understanding that authors should only apply ARIA via script.
No. Where do you understand that from?
The
redundancy cases seem to be the most reasonable use cases I've heard of for
wanting ARIA in the initial markup, but even that
Hi All,
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
into a decoded string. Similarly being able to encode a string into an
ArrayBuffer (or part thereof).
Something as simple as
DOMString
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
into a decoded string. Similarly being able to encode a string into an
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
into a decoded string. Similarly being able to encode a string into an
ArrayBuffer (or part thereof).
Joshua Bell has been working on a string encoding and decoding API
that supports the needed encodings, and which is separable from the
core typed array API:
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/StringEncoding
This is the direction I prefer. String encoding and decoding seems to
be a complex enough
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
Joshua Bell has been working on a string encoding and decoding API
that supports the needed encodings, and which is separable from the
core typed array API:
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/StringEncoding
This is the
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
into a decoded string. Similarly being able to encode a string into an
ArrayBuffer
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
Joshua Bell has been working on a string encoding and decoding API
that supports the needed encodings, and which is separable from the
core typed array
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Unfortunately I suspect getting anything added on the String object will
take a few years given that it's too late to get into ES6 (and in any
case I suspect adding ArrayBuffer dependencies to ES6 would be
controversial).
We can just define it
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
into a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
lately has been the desire to convert an ArrayBuffer (or part thereof)
into a
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Joshua Bell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com
wrote:
Joshua Bell has been working on a string encoding and decoding API
that supports the needed encodings,
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Joshua Bell wrote:
WHATWG makes sense, I just hadn't gotten around to shopping for a home.
(Administrivia: Is there need to propose a charter addition?)
You're welcome to use the WHATWG list for this. Charters are pointless and
there's no need to worry about them here.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
Something that has come up a couple of times with content authors
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
The API on that wiki page is a reasonable start. For the same reasons that
we discussed in a recent thread (
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1589.html),
conversion errors should use replacement
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Joshua Bell wrote:
For both of the above: initially suggested use cases included parsing
data as esoteric as ID3 tags in MP3 files, where encoding unspecified
and is guessed at by decoders, and includes non-Unicode encodings. It
was suggested that the encoding
Using Views instead of specifying the offset and length sounds good.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
- What's the use case for supporting anything but UTF-8?
Other Unicode encodings may be useful, to decode existing file formats
containing (most likely at a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Using Views instead of specifying the offset and length sounds good.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
- What's the use case for supporting anything but UTF-8?
Other Unicode encodings
25 matches
Mail list logo
