On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I ended up reverting that text, it didn't really work. Is there anything
else you need for XHR instead?
I guess I will just special case data URLs in the same way. Seems
somewhat ugly, but I do not really have a better alternative
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
It would help catch the not uncommon antipattern where the content
of a link or button is provided only by a background image.
a href=somewhere/a
a
Am 07.09.2012 03:36 schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.:
This email is an extension of the thread started at
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-August/036953.html
by John Mellor, distilling the core problem he has into a more
easily-understood and digested form.
The srcset attribute,
I'm developing a CMS and would like to be able to submit user-edited
content back to the server, but at present, it's not possible to do
this without copying the contents of the edited element with
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
be some mechanism to associate
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:07:30 +0200, Fred Andrews freda...@live.com wrote:
From: jackalm...@gmail.com
...
I'm not sure how best to solve this, but John Mellor suggested
allowing the specification of the image's native dimensions somehow.
That way, the browser could know that the 1600.jpg
Proposal:
I'd like to propose adding new IDL attribute to HTMLInputElement.
readonly attribute DOMString rawValue;
It returns text content which a user actually see in an input field.
* For text, search, url, tel, password types, it's equivalent to 'value'
IDL attribute.
* For email type,
2012-09-07 07:35 Europe/Helsinki: Ian Hickson:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I think while in theory we could rely on UAs to enable barcode entry
anywhere, which definitely would provide the maximum capabilities for
[...]
In this respect it's similar to the
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
be some mechanism to associate contentEditable elements with
forms—maybe the combination of contentEditable=true and the presence
of @name creates an implicit form control? The
From: sim...@opera.com
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:07:30 +0200, Fred Andrews freda...@live.com wrote:
From: jackalm...@gmail.com
...
I'm not sure how best to solve this, but John Mellor suggested
allowing the specification of the image's native dimensions somehow.
That way, the
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Mikko Rantalainen
mikko.rantalai...@peda.net wrote:
However, it's far from clear if this is worth WHATWG specification right
yet. All these features could be nice but unless UA vendors are going to
implement at least some of these, there's no point.
There's
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that this shouldn't be hard to do without magic. Just something
like this in the UA style sheet:
[contenteditable]:empty { min-height: 1em; }
contenteditable is not a boolean attribute -- you'd need to do
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I think while in theory we could rely on UAs to enable barcode entry
anywhere, which definitely would provide the maximum capabilities for
the user. In practice it seems hard to create
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I think while in theory we could rely on UAs to enable barcode entry
anywhere, which definitely would provide the maximum capabilities for
the user. In practice it seems hard to create UI which enables that
while at the
On 9/6/12 6:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following example:
img srcset=800.jpg 1x, 1600.jpg 2x style=width: 100%; height: auto;
For a screen that's somewhere near 800px wide, this works just fine.
However, a 1x screen 1600px wide (not too uncommon - I think a
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Hans Muller hmul...@adobe.com wrote:
On 9/6/12 6:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following example:
img srcset=800.jpg 1x, 1600.jpg 2x style=width: 100%; height: auto;
For a screen that's somewhere near 800px wide, this works just
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Fred Andrews wrote:
I think the aim is to have the URL of the page that includes these data:
URLs sent to the tracking server?
Ah, I see. So say you have a page A, which itself contains a data: URL,
and you
Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
JavaScript into, say, a hidden form field. I think that there should
be some mechanism to associate contentEditable elements with
forms—maybe the combination of contentEditable=true and the presence
On Sep 6, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:45:41 +0200, Mathew Marquis m...@matmarquis.com
wrote:
I can say for my own part: manipulating strings is far more difficult than
manipulating the value of individual attributes. It’s hard to imagine a
situation
18 matches
Mail list logo
