Thanks for the feedback.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
Many sites have 'upload your files' feature, like for your photo images.
HTML5 allows you to do this via input type=file multiple or
drag-and-drop
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
The kind of predictability we have for the HTML parser, I want to have for the
URL parser as well.
Yes, please!!
--tobie
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Alexandre Morgaut
alexandre.morg...@4d.com wrote:
Would the URLUtil interface replace the URL decomposition IDL attributes of
the Location interface?
-
Le 21 sept. 2012 à 17:16, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
I took a crack at defining URLs: http://url.spec.whatwg.org/
Very cool.
On cite attributes, I'm using urn:isbn:
blockquote cite=urn:isbn:2-7073-1038-7
pJ'aime la liberté. J'aime être responsable
de mes actes. J'aime comprendre
2012-09-24 12:47, Karl Dubost wrote:
On cite attributes, I'm using urn:isbn:
blockquote cite=urn:isbn:2-7073-1038-7
pJ'aime la liberté. J'aime être responsable
de mes actes. J'aime comprendre ce que je
fais… Et, cependant, je donne mon accord
à ce marché bizarre./p
On 24 sept. 2012, at 11:34, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Could the search property have a key/value mapping?
ex:
http://test.com?param1=value1
- var value1 = url.search.param1
search as window.location could still be usable as a string
I have been thinking about introducing a .query attribute
On 24 sept. 2012, at 14:08, Alexandre Morgaut wrote:
sms:+15105550101?body=hello%20there
{
host: +15105550101,
hostname: +15105550101,
href: +15105550101?body=hello%20there,
parameters: {
body: hello there
}
pathname: ,
Le 24 sept. 2012 à 12:08, Jukka K. Korpela a écrit :
It also means that the only immediately available source information for a
quotation will be an ISBN in URL format. So, for example, working offline,
you won't see even the title and the author. Would the quotation even satisfy
the legal
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
So, can we rename the 7-arg arcTo to ellipseTo? That seems to support
your always [require] all the
On 9/24/12 4:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Say you have a href=data:test/; the concern is what e.g.
a.protocol and a.pathname would return here. For invalid URLs they
would return : and respectively. If we treat this as a valid URL
you would get data: and test. In Gecko I get http: and . If I
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
I have been thinking about introducing a .query attribute that would
return a special interface for this purpose, but what the right API
should be seems somewhat tricky. Adam and Erik came up with a solution
that
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Has there been any discussion about moving newly emerging APIs to a single
options object formal parameter?
This discussion is in the context of the SVG path API, which is an
attribute microsyntax. So, that's not
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
Has there been any discussion about moving newly emerging APIs to a
single
options object formal parameter?
This discussion is in the
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
So, can we rename the 7-arg arcTo to ellipseTo? That seems to
support your always [require] all the arguments recommendation. ^_^
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Charlie Reis wrote:
Does this need to be done from window.open()?
Yes. For example, Gmail uses window.open() for the links in emails, but
would like the links to open in an unrelated context.
Why does GMail need to use window.open()? Surely the right way to expose
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
So, can we rename the 7-arg arcTo to ellipseTo? That seems to
support
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
So, can we rename the 7-arg arcTo to ellipseTo? That seems to
support
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I'm not at all convinced that that's true. Sure, it is fewer number of
functions to document and fewer number of functions for people to learn.
But that obviously isn't the only metric that we care about since then
we'd just cram all functionality
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Omitting two numbers, one of which is zero, is easily no more a win
than the cost of having two different nearly-identical commands. Just
consider C/c and S/s; is it really worth it?
Yes, it is. ^_^ The authoring convenience of not having to
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Alexandre Morgaut alexandre.morg...@4d.com
wrote:
Shouldn't this document have references on some of the URL related RFCs:
The plan is to obsolete the RFCs. But yes, I will add some
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Omitting two numbers, one of which is zero, is easily no more a win
than the cost of having two different nearly-identical commands. Just
consider C/c and S/s; is it really worth
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
You are looking at the simplest possible use-case for A/a, nearly the
only case that can be done without trig, where you're starting and
stopping the arc at a quarter-turn. Try virtually anything more
complex, like rotating the square 45deg.
On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
You are looking at the simplest possible use-case for A/a, nearly the
only case that can be done without trig, where you're starting and
stopping the arc at a quarter-turn. Try
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
You are looking at the simplest possible use-case for A/a, nearly the
only case that can be done without trig, where you're starting and
stopping the arc at a quarter-turn. Try
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggest just making it a map from String-[String]. You probably
want a little bit of magic - if the setter receives an array, replace
the current value with it; anything else, stringify then wrap in an
array and
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Dirk Schulze wrote:
Making the path syntax more complex than it needs to be seems not to be
an option for me.
It's definitely an option, assuming this is not a trivial statement,
because it's no the only axis along which the syntax can be optimised, and
it is not the
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, John Knottenbelt wrote:
How should the data url returned by toDataURL be sized in the case of a
high device dpi resolution system?
This is now specced, at least in theory. Please let me know if you still
think this is underdefined.
The test
On Sep 24, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Dirk Schulze wrote:
Making the path syntax more complex than it needs to be seems not to be
an option for me.
It's definitely an option, assuming this is not a trivial statement,
because it's no the
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Returning to the original subject, we don't *want* optional arguments
here.
Well, the canvas API has optional arguments, so there's no way to be
consistent with canvas with this
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggest just making it a map from String-[String]. You probably
want a little bit of magic - if the setter receives an array, replace
the current
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote:
Is there an issue with defining WHATWG-URL syntax as a grammar extension
to the URI syntax in RFC3986?
In general, BNF isn't very useful for defining the parsing rules when you
also need to handle non-conforming content in a correct manner. Really it
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
We could add an event that fires on ImageData (or even ArrayBuffer) that
fires when the data is available. If we add it to ArrayBuffer it's
something that could be used in other contexts, too.
Is this something that people
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Why does GMail need to use window.open()? Surely the right way to expose a
link is to use a href=. What is forcing them to use window.open()?
I can't speak for Gmail, but Google Reader uses window.open since it allows
On 9/24/12 8:42 PM, Mihai Parparita wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Why does GMail need to use window.open()? Surely the right way to expose a
link is to use a href=. What is forcing them to use window.open()?
I can't speak for Gmail, but Google
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote:
Is there an issue with defining WHATWG-URL syntax as a grammar extension
to the URI syntax in RFC3986?
In general, BNF isn't very useful for defining the parsing rules when you
also
The right mailing list for these questions is www-...@w3.org.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Егор Николаев termi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Right now I'm looking for a way to implement 'DOM keyboard event level 3'
into my current project and also I'm developing polyfill for this API (
This is Anne's spec, so I'll let him give more canonical answers, but:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote:
Your conforming WHATWG-URL syntax will have production rule alphabets
which are supersets of the alphabets in RFC3986.
Not necessarily, but that's certainly possible. Personally
Turns out, some things care about at least the .href and .toString of
Location objects for security-check purposes. So they need to be
unforgeable. But of course WebIDL doesn't provide a way to make
anything other than readonly attributes unforgeable. It seems like it
needs to.
In terms
38 matches
Mail list logo
