Re: [whatwg] map id=

getElementById() anyway as you have to check both id= and name=. To keep behavior the same between HTML quirks, HTML standards and XML doing a case-insensitive match makes some sense. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] document.writeln() without arguments

document.writeln() without arguments should cause a single line-break to be inserted into the stream. This should probably be part of the document.writeln() definition. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Offline Web Apps

page foo.cgi?page=x wouldn't that page also be simply the offline page? What exactly is the scenario in some more detail? (Note that with history.pushState() you can set the URI of the current page so the fragment identifier bookmarking argument is no longer very relevant.) -- Anne van

Re: [whatwg] Offline Web Apps

/scripting context change. You seem to have missed what I pointed out earlier: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#pushstate This allows applications to make distinct URIs while keeping all the other benefits. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] SQL API error handling

that is not available for some reason * Database that is full I think it should also be a bit more clear on how the user agent constructs the SQL statement. Cheers, -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Offline Web Apps

level 2 supports sending ByteArray. So you could do something like the following maybe: xhr.send(file.bytes) Although if HTML5 gains a native File object I suppose support for that could be added as well if there's any benefit. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http

Re: [whatwg] [wf2] :read-write pseudoclass description issue

Quoting Rikkert Koppes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...] A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are orthogonal. I believe the term orthogonal is incorrect here. :read-write is orthogonal to :disabled. That's correct. -- Anne van Kesteren http://www.opera.com

Re: [whatwg] Compatibility problems with HTML5 Canvas spec.

for Infinity -Infinity and NaN for all of those. I don't have a strong opinion on it either way, although I would prefer it to be decided quickly so we have some time to propagate the changes in time for Opera 9.5. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Radio controls shared with multiple forms

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:18:48 +0100, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The draft should probably be more explicit about: input type=radio name=A form=form1 input type=radio name=A form=form1 form2 checked input type=radio name=A form=form2 Assuming form1 and form2 both exist

Re: [whatwg] Video, Closed Captions, and Audio Description Tracks

for the browser to layer something div-equivalent over the media elements supporting captioning and pipe the HTML captions into it (with caution, imagine a caption itself recursively embedding a video). I think the cue points feature is designed to do that. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl

[whatwg] database full error (was: Re: executeSql API is synchronous)

platforms there's not much storage space available and knowing whether or not there's some space left is useful. So you can decide to only store the critical data for instance. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] SQL API and database metadata at creation

-- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] SVG extensions to canvas

nicer at some point. Cheers, -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] SQL API and changeVersion() with no callbacks

that that have an explicit null though. Who do other people think? There at least some feedback from the developer community that they'd like to see optional arguments: http://www.dustindiaz.com/dom-interfaces-suck/ -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] SVG extensions to canvas

of the reasons it's simply gets clipped instead of scaled. (And clipping is a feature too, keep that in mind.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] textarea pattern

The way newlines are handled for textarea maxlength should also apply to textarea pattern to keep things consistent. That is, lines are CRLF delimited. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] several messages about a way to disable referer headers for links

certainly need not duplicate it for noreferrer. There must be some end to this self-humiliation. I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the feature affects the Referer (sic) header. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] BIG Element

, there are people working on solving this issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007May/0030.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] address markup (was: Re: time and meter elements)

Notwithstanding what I consider misuse of br in that example, I would encourage people to use hCard to mark up a name instead of us introducing an element for the purpose. How would you mark that up instead? address (currently) doesn't allow block-level descendents. -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] clientWidth and innerWidth

on this: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/ Discussion should take place on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The draft will be published as a W3C First Public Working Draft soonish, though this may be after new year given the holidays and such. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http

Re: [whatwg] Suggestion: API for accessing cookies (document.cookies)

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:13:38 +0100, Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you think of this? I think that globalStorage and sessionStorage obviate the need for cookies. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Revised Plan for Server-sent DOM events

with everyone where you can restrict that with Access Control. Especially for authenticated services this might be problematic. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Minor addition/rewording for canvas section

for an unsafe HTMLCanvasElement. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Shadows

that it is a bit vague, but do you have any specific suggestions as to what it should say exactly? I'm not sure what to write. http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-June/011799.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] How to use SVG in HTML5?

files)? HTML 5 defines processing of HTML5, XHTML5, and documents created using DOM methods. Only the latter two can contain elements from other namespaces at this point. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] More random comments on the putImageData definition

and ImageData.width and .height return 4 you know there's a factor two scaling happening between canvas pixels and device pixels. What the factor is between canvas pixels and CSS pixels isn't really relevant (and easy to determine). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] More random comments on the putImageData definition

displays: canvas height=1000 width=1000 style=height:100px;width:100px (Might be a bit much.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Some video questions

, but will there be read-only attributes for the width, height and position for controls? There are readonly attributes to get the height and width of the video. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Referer header sent with a ping?

-To. Provisionally registering headers is pretty simple and when HTML5 finally becomes a W3C Recommendation we can move them to the permanent registry. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] canvas and ImageData

van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

[whatwg] createImageData - new ImageData() ?

Why not give the object a constructor? I think that's cleaner. Also, Opera already supports that :-) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] createImageData - new ImageData() ?

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:20:54 +0100, Oliver Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 3, 2008, at 2:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Why not give the object a constructor? I think that's cleaner. Also, Opera already supports that :-) The biggest problem is that you would have to define

Re: [whatwg] SQL storage and onunload

On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:24:58 +0100, Brady Eidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as the unload handler question, what are the semantics for XHR? I think the user leaving the page is the same as aborting the download. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] createImageData - new ImageData() ?

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:21:34 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote: Why not give the object a constructor? I think that's cleaner. Also, Opera already supports that :-) The relationship between the height and width arguments and the height

Re: [whatwg] SQL storage and onunload

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:06:39 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 9, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: As far as the unload handler question, what are the semantics for XHR? I think the user leaving the page is the same as aborting the download. I've seen

Re: [whatwg] canvas and ImageData

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:52:33 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote: The moment people start using getImageData() as storage mechanism (which they will if browsers do not fix their data: image origin stuff) you'll have a problem So you want

[whatwg] reply() extension to postMessage()

described in terms of equivalence. That is, e.reply(message) is equivalent to e.source.postMessage(message, e.origin) except that the latter won't work anymore when reply() is added. Kind regards, -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] reply() extension to postMessage()

reply is invoked on that event object it creates an event that again has the same UUID. Both parties can have multiple conversations that way by checking the UUID of the message. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] drawImage with non-existent images

no new risk here. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] HTML 5: The l (line) element

.../) on the same nesting level from an empty into a start tag. Actually, we can't. /br is a br start tag because of legacy. I don't see why l is so compelling by the way. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Workers in HTML5

the object and interface a different name doesn't really help. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a link attribute to replace a href

[... global attribute for links ...] We have a FAQ entry on this -- quite common -- request: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Does_HTML5_support_href_on_any_element_like_XHTML_2.0.3F Hope that helps! -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] @Irrelevant [was: Re: Thoughts on HTML 5]

already have sections in the page for several steps, but only one of those sections is currently relevant. The rest is marked irrelevant until the user completes some action. This is a totally different case from the one you seem to be worried about. -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] Issues concerning the base element and xml:base

resource however if the base URI changed since the initial load. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Issues concerning the base element and xml:base

for Firefox 3 not to fix its behavior (which is fine by me, the restriction on moving nodes doesn't make much sense). I'd expect it to be used with XMLHttpRequest for instance. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Preventing nested click() calls

think we're fine either way though. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Tree construction: parse error and plaintext

use plaintext, you'll have a parse error at EOF. Is this intended? Yes: http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-January/009113.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Images preprocessing

extensions to the input type=file control and canvas. (The extensions basically give you access to the file contents.) They will have to write the processing script themselves. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Video

with camcorders, to be clear, given that animation in HTML has come up elsewhere.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Video

there's considerable overlap between the two communities they're not the same thing. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Request: window.postMessage should be async

synthesized event dispatching is synchronous. I don't think postMessage() should be different. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Request: window.postMessage should be async

On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:03:58 +0200, Aaron Boodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't make sense to change this given that all synthesized event dispatching is synchronous. I don't think postMessage() should

Re: [whatwg] Listing element

in the specification. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Request: window.postMessage should be async

synchronous was more a side effect of the moving process than something intentional.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Request: Canvas Tag CSS

search and replace through JavaScript files and CSS files not suffice? Alternatively, you could use getComputedStyle() to get the color values from your CSS file. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Request: Canvas Tag CSS

/daltonize/ As far as that goes I don't think you should classify canvas any different from a scripted img. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] More Storage clarification

setItem() is called with a null value. 2 - Specify setItem(key, null) to have the exact same effects as removeItem(key). I prefer #2. Thoughts? Euhm, setItem() takes two strings. Therefore I'd expect null, undefined, etc. to be stringified. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http

Re: [whatwg] img element: downloading a resource

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:03:45 +0200, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote: The definition of downloading a resource must be clear that even if the resource does not need to be downloaded (because it has been cached or something) the load event still

Re: [whatwg] Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics

obstacles to this exist? The Web. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:01:49 +0200, William F Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Web. Really!?! Yes, see for instance: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/1248.html It's time for user agents to stop supporting bogus

Re: [whatwg] Question about the PICS label in HTML5

community. ' Is that really so? That's the current proposal. I personally think a W3C Recommendation backing it should be enough as well. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Element borders as resizable handles

for: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-background-origin ? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Element borders as resizable handles

100x100px wide regardless of the border size, but the content size would shrink and expand. Oh, you want 'box-sizing': http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511/#box-sizing (This property has several UA implementations already. Some with a prefix only, admittedly.) -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] A suggestion, if postMessage becomes async

a * as argument? I would prefer we keep that part of the API as is. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Are unfocusable elements focusable with tabIndex=-1.

implementations do differ. I think it would make sense for Firefox and Opera (and Safari) to align with Internet Explorer and ignore the tabindex attribute when it has an invalid value specified. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] DOM Storage feedback

, setItem(foo, null); Is this correct? If so, the spec is fine as-is, and removeItem() is the only way to remove an individual item. This was what I was suggesting, yes. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] link rel=icon width=

) that would imply a body element for instance. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a link attribute to replace a href

think we should allow this for cases as demonstrated by this site: http://noorderlicht.vpro.nl/ (Disclaimer: I have worked on that site three years ago.) (I agree that a global href= attribute would not be very feasible given all the other attributes a has.) -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a link attribute to replace a href

a as being phrasing content only. The only issue I see if this were added, is whether it would be better to have the ismap attribute of img only work with a or to have it work with the new element as well. The a element can already do this and it would be backwards compatible. -- Anne van Kesteren

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a link attribute to replace a href

. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Context help in Web Forms

that, if we don't make it clear what the idea is that might end up happening in practice here and there. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Bad CSS on the multipage version

specify it on font-size), it's different from the traditional em unit in that respect. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Bad CSS on the multipage version

with your suggested replacement rule? I'd expect that to not work. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Issues concerning the base element and xml:base

in a particular browser while we can still make the handling something sane we can all agree on. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] video background color

represent nothing. What does this mean? Black is customary for video, but leaving the region transparent (thus falling back to css background color) is another option. Which is better? Maybe a default style sheet entry like video { background-color:#000 } -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] comment on autofocus attribute from Web Forms 2.0 spec

. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Restricting style inheritance

div style='inherit: nothing'/div That would be CSS. I suggest you subscribe to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list and give your feedback there. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Sandboxing to accommodate user generated content.

= and seamless= we already have for sandboxing. This attribute, doc=, would take a string of markup where you would only need to escape the quotation character used (so either ' or ). The fallback for legacy user agents would be the src= attribute. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl

Re: [whatwg] Javascript API to query supported codecs for video and audio

is that needed? The elements provide a way to link to multiple codecs of which the user agent will then make a choice. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for cross domain security framework

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:34:27 +0200, Frode Børli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I'd suggest looking into the work the W3C has been doing on this for the past two years: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/ http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/ -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for cross domain security framework

that do not check this header? It's not strictly required, but highly recommended. Older Web applications wouldn't opt-in and would therefore be as vulnerable as they are today. Anyway, this is the wrong list to debate that specification. You want [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Anne van Kesteren http

[whatwg] same-origin versus same origin

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/ has some usage of same-origin while it seems that the intention is for it to be all same origin. I'd prefer if it was all same origin (apart from tokens, of course) as that's what I/I'll use in XLMHttpRequest et al. -- Anne van Kesteren http

[whatwg] URL and Document

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#url says that URL is always associated with a Document. What does that mean for the second argument of postMessage? Or for the value of Websocket-Origin? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] keygen element

be delayed slightly because Web Forms 2.0 is not integrated yet, but that might happen soon.) Kind regards, -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Should enter be mapped to click?

, there's a lot of clients out there without an Enter key. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Scroll events + bubbling?

tested this but it might very well be that if you dispatch a custom bubbling event named scroll the onscroll attribute of an ancestor element, of the element on which you dispatch it, might very well trigger.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] keygen element

actually played with it so far.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Should enter be mapped to click?

/div The specification states that only certain elements are interactive content, not everything that's focusable. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] pushState

think the URL argument is the best part of this feature. I don't want to lose it! -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] Ghosts from the past and the semantic Web

. It may not be ideal, but it fits with the existing spec. Actually, data- attributes are not intended for this purpose. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] TH scope=TBODY

related work (I have searched, without success)? Or does scope=ROWGROUP cover that? rowgroup does indeed cover that scenario. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency

(people being able to do their own thing, unified data model, etc), though I agree with others that the complexity (lengthy URIs, qname/curie cruft) is an issue. Especially given the copy paste authors you want to enable this for, down the road. -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:55:07 +0200, Ben Adida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne van Kesteren wrote: FWIW, when considering language complexity, just considering whether it impacts user agents seems naïve. Eg, it impacts people reading the specification, people writing documentation, people writing

Re: [whatwg] RDFa uses CURIEs, not QNames

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:08:37 +0200, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne van Kesteren wrote: The idea and premise of RDF is sort of attractive (people being able to do their own thing, unified data model, etc), though I agree with others that the complexity (lengthy URIs, ***qname

Re: [whatwg] A slightly different use-case for shared workers

place in the stream. Why shouldn’t that throw a WRONG_DOCUMENT_ERR? Because browsers knowingly violate the DOM and we now plan on updating the DOM specification to match the arguably more sane behavior of not throwing (and simply modifying ownerDocument). -- Anne van Kesteren http

Re: [whatwg] List of differences between whatwg and w3c spec?

. (gsnedders is working on a tool that does the same, is completely open, and open source.) The output is then the two links you showed above. (Nobody mentioned the specifics so I thought I'd give another reply to this e-mail.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http

Re: [whatwg] defining new HTTP headers

based on Web APIs (e.g., XMLHttpRequest, form, etc.). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] defining new HTTP headers

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:07:54 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne van Kesteren wrote: ... What's true is that you can't require existing HTTP/1.1 clients to send it with every POST request (did anybody seriously suggest that?). The suggestion was for POST requests the browser

Re: [whatwg] defining new HTTP headers

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:16:06 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So what's the spec defining Origin? I thought it was XmlHttpRequest(2)? Access Control for Cross-Site Requests. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [whatwg] defining new HTTP headers

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:28:21 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne van Kesteren wrote: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/index.html So, is there a case where IANA registration was attempted and expert review did *not* happen? This e-mail from

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >