Re: [whatwg] api for fullscreen()

2009-12-17 Thread Eric Uhrhane
2009/12/16 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc: 2009/12/16 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) ife...@google.com: I think what I've heard from application developers over and over again is that, while the UA may provide some way to go into full screen from in the browser chrome, it is much more discoverable when

Re: [whatwg] Multiple file download

2010-03-10 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Jose Fandos iaminlon...@gmail.com wrote: Er... sure. It is not as convenient for certain web apps when compared to desktop apps. With this supported, the gap get's reduced. Adding support for

Re: [whatwg] New File attributes creationDate, modificationDate and size

2010-05-18 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote: On 5/12/10 4:25 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 00:05 -0400, Biju wrote: It would be good if we can also get the same at server side when user upload a file using form with file controls ie, like

Re: [whatwg] Canvas API: What should happen if non-finite floats are used

2010-09-08 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote: The problem with throwing an exception is that it's fairly common for code to end up accidentally producing a NaN or Infinite value, and throwing an exception would prevent all subsequent drawing from occurring. I believe

Re: [whatwg] ArrayBuffer and ByteArray questions

2010-09-08 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote: Hi, Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec, like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed

Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August 2010 - Request for enhancement

2010-09-14 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Jim Williams jgwilli...@mindspring.com wrote: I tried out local storage, used it to save the contents of a content-editable passage.  It worked great in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and MSIE.  Only one problem:  Every time I switched browsers, I had to start over

Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August 2010 - Request for enhancement

2010-09-14 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Jim Williams jgwilli...@mindspring.com wrote: I see localStorage and sessionStorage as a chance to fix things that weren't so good with cookies.  So I'd be interested to know what factors actively promote the failure to come up with a common browser-independent

Re: [whatwg] Inline Web Worker

2010-10-15 Thread Eric Uhrhane
How about using a Blob URL? See the discussion here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-html5/tree/browse_frm/thread/4288931009182422/12703ab802469702. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Ytterbrink sam...@ytterbrink.nu wrote: Hi I have found something really 

Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API

2011-02-28 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: I'd like some clarification on the intent of the FileSystem API: requestFileSystem permanent, getDirectory and getFile. The FileSystem API has several goals. Some of them are targeted by the current spec, and some have

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2011-04-11 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.comwrote: Right. As an end-user I ask: Does a web developer publishing links to resources have a say as to whether I render aforementioned resource

Re: [whatwg] Zip archives as first-class citizens

2013-08-28 Thread Eric Uhrhane
Again from the right address... On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote: Without commenting on the other parts of the proposal, let me just mention that every time .zip support comes up, we notice that it's not a great web archive format because it's not streamable.

Re: [whatwg] Zip archives as first-class citizens

2013-08-28 Thread Eric Uhrhane
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Eric Uhrhane er...@chromium.org wrote: We've covered this several times. The directory records in a zip can be superseded by further directories later in the archive, so you can't trust