Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
Currently it seems that there are two practical ways to link to a
iCalendar file; one may distribute the .ics file via HTTP or with
webcal protocol (which, if I've understood correctly, is just HTTP
with different protocol name to help with binding with correct program).
Dan Mosedale wrote:
One nice property of the webcal: URI scheme is that any user-agent can
reasonably infer the intended use (which is likely to carry the
semantic that the URI will be around for a longer period of time)
simply from the URI. So this URI can simply be included in any sort
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
- Continued problems of the 2 connection limit on HTTP server
scalability
Is there any realistic solution to this other than to use separate
domains and have cross-domain working?
Simply get rid of, or significantly raise, the limit? Standards work
related to this
The escaping specified in
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#custom-handlers is
slightly different than the escaping done by encodeURIComponent (as
described at
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference:Global_Functions:encodeURIComponent).
Jonas Sicking wrote:
Elliotte Harold wrote:
How much, if any, support is planned is Firefox 3 for HTML 5 and
especially WebForms 2.0 features? Looking at the prodyct requirements
document it doesn't seem like anything is likely to make thi release.
Is that accurate?
Has Mozilla given any
