I disagree, there are so many other things you need to take account of if
you were (for example) getting all the text out of an HTML document. Text
and markup in comment nodes would just through a spanner in the works for
starters.
It all boils down to the fact that the only thing disallowing in
I agree. The application should be able to choose a source for speech
commands, or give the user a choice of options for a speech source. It also
provides a much better separation of APIs, allowing the development of a
speech API that doesn't depend on or interfere in any way with the
development
I'd suggest using an attribute over a type specifier too. Not only does it
have the problem Marius spotted, but if you specified a type attribute then
you have much more difficulty displaying content of the same type from both
a CDN and dynamic user content in the same page (such as in a social
I'm in perfect agreement regarding the rational behind having a model tag as
I agree with having more semantic tags in HTML. However, I don't think a
model tag would work as described as it would provide no real extra benefits
and would just confuse document authors.
The reason I feel this is
not giving its due diligence. Tons of JS just to open a 3D
viewport in HTML is far from what I would consider a complete spec. The
wafer-boxes that 3D CSS produce are an ill of HTML, not of CSS.
-Brian MB
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:46 AM, David Workman workm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in perfect
Oops, only sent this to one recipient earlier.
2009/10/11 David Workman workm...@gmail.com
Peter,
From reading this discussion, I think you've slightly missed a salient
point with regards to the current state of play with frames.
Frames aren't in HTML 4.01 Strict, they were moved
2009/10/6 Hugh Guiney hugh.gui...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Erik Vorhes e...@textivism.com wrote:
I suppose a allows for more functionality in current UAs, but this
is an interesting proposition, especially if there were a way to
crosslink cite used in this way to the
To throw my views into the mix:
I think 'article' is more suitable than 'post' or 'entry' semantically. A
blog post can reasonably be called an article (although it stretches the
concept a bit for forum posts), whereas in an online newspaper or magazine,
'article' is definitely appropriate whereas
