. This would map to Firefox's Not
now permission choice.
Your proposal makes it fairly easy for sites to stick up annoying full
content blocking you must change your settings to proceed elements.
This is the wrong path.
--
-- James May
On 20 September 2010 16:17, Roger Hågensen resca...@emsai.net wrote:
On 2010-09-20 05:27, Chris Pearce wrote:
Right, so you want to be able to toggle the poster back on (when the media
is paused or ended) but after playback has started.
I wonder if these are separate use cases, e.g.
On 25 August 2010 12:50, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 8/24/10 7:09 PM, Ben Lerner wrote:
The history navigation analogy is a good one: pages presumably already
have to handle the pageshow event to deal with being revived from the
history, and the browser already needs to know
On 26 August 2010 17:27, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 8/26/10 3:23 AM, James May wrote:
Couldn't the iframe be kept alive, but remain associated with it's
parent browsing context until (if) it was re-parented / inserted into a
different document. (does this match what other
On 27 August 2010 05:02, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 8/26/10 11:58 AM, James May wrote:
I thought I just suggested that?
Everything works normally (as if it was still attached) until it is
reattached, when the situation is re-evaluated.
That could fall afoul of security
On 4 August 2010 20:08, Christoph Päper christoph.pae...@crissov.de wrote:
* Argument: What about incremental rendering?
If there are, for instance, lots of (content) images in the resource file I
will see them all at once as soon as the ZIP has been downloaded completely
and decompressed,
Why wouldn'tinput type=file be usable for this? You should be able to
drag any file to that, just like you can type in a URL in Windows in an
open file dialog box.
input type=file would be usable.
Were this implemented:
When a user through selection, click+drag or manual entry of a URL
Perhaps to avoid the legacy baggage it could be a simple attribute
eg. a href=blah download
This would prevent duplicating 'type', and bringing in all the
knowledge people seem to not have about how 'content-disposition'
works in headers.
or even an extension of target?
eg. a href=blah
Couldn't SCTP/DCCP (or a variant) over UDP (for NAT compatibility) work?
They seem both seem to be session oriented while loosening the other
restrictions of TCP,
On 4 June 2010 00:18, Philip Taylor
excors+wha...@gmail.comexcors%2bwha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Erik
If this change is made, what is the correct (explicit) way to refer to the
current URL? . ?
In terms of web compat, I do recall a web picture gallery package that
returned a html information page with a self reference to show the actual
image.
-- James
2009/12/15 Maciej Stachowiak
10 matches
Mail list logo
