Re: [whatwg] more discussion regarding codecs (Was: whatwg Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16)

2007-12-12 Thread bofh
On Dec 12, 2007 1:07 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what the courts say than with what the patents say. If Apple say they > don't want to implement Ogg, then we have to find another solution. > > (Similarly -- Opera, Mozilla, et al, don't want to implement H.264. So we > have to find

Re: [whatwg] whatwg Digest, Vol 45, Issue 16

2007-12-11 Thread bofh
On Dec 11, 2007 5:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The whole point of the change was to make the point that we need something > > that will not screw you. Ogg isn't a solution, as it won't be implemented > > by Apple and Microsoft. If we require Ogg, then what will happen is the > > big playe