I'm implementing these latest changes and it looks like there are some
typos in this edit:
- The ErrorEvent interface has a 'fileno' property, not a 'lineno'
property as mentioned elsewhere. I believe it should be 'lineno'.
- There's a stray 'span' before 'queue a task'.
Then I have a few more
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, ben turner wrote:
I'm implementing these latest changes and it looks like there are some
typos in this edit:
- The ErrorEvent interface has a 'fileno' property, not a 'lineno'
property as mentioned elsewhere. I believe it should be 'lineno'.
- There's a stray
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I ended up using a combination of both the event mechanism and the old
Window.onerror mechanism. The spec now says to fire onerror in the
worker global scope, using the old
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, ben turner wrote:
Assuming we have a page that creates a worker (let's call this
worker the parent), and it creates a new worker (the child).
First, we currently use a MessageEvent object for our
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, ben turner wrote:
Assuming we have a page that creates a worker (let's call this
worker the parent), and it creates a new worker (the
Yes, I agree, try/catch works just as well for that. The only thing we
really need is a way to communicate errors to the parent IMO.
-Ben
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I ended up using a combination of both the event mechanism and the old
Window.onerror mechanism. The spec now says to fire onerror in the
worker global scope, using the old mechanism, and if that doesn't
handle the error then a series of
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, ben turner wrote:
I just got around to fixing the error handling in our worker
implementation and realized that the spec is a little vague here,
especially when workers are created within workers. This is what we have
now, and Jonas and I both find it intuitive and
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, ben turner wrote:
I just got around to fixing the error handling in our worker
implementation and realized that the spec is a little vague here,
especially when workers are created within workers. This is what we have
now, and Jonas and I both find it
Hey folks,
I just got around to fixing the error handling in our worker
implementation and realized that the spec is a little vague here,
especially when workers are created within workers. This is what we
have now, and Jonas and I both find it intuitive and useful:
Assuming we have a page that
10 matches
Mail list logo
