On 12/20/05, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, they shouldn't be able to. Or at least, in many UAs they can't.
Do you know of UAs that will prevent a file: URL document from
loading another file: URL in a frame or iframe? Or apply any
restrictions to scripting access to the
On Dec 19, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Untrusted content is unclear. It implies the existence of
something that isn't untrusted content, i.e. trusted content.
Where is that defined? I do not believe it is defined anywhere, in
which case specifying its behavior seems non-useful.
I
On Dec 12, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Note that user agents may implement whichever URI schemes are
required
for their particular application. The WF2 specification does not
specify a required core set of protocols that must be
implemented. For
those that are implemented, UAs
On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I think a lot of section 5.6 should be removed from the spec.
Most of section 5.6 consists of defining behaviour to ensure
interoperability between implementations, since if the spec doesn't
list
